Related Experiment Videos

Neurodevelopmental outcome in ECMO vs near-miss ECMO patients at 5 years of age

K Rais-Bahrami1, A E Wagner, C Coffman

  • 1Department of Neonatology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Clinical Pediatrics
|April 7, 2000
PubMed

Insights

Children treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and critically ill children who narrowly missed ECMO treatment show similar neurodevelopmental outcomes at age five. Both groups face similar risks for school failure, necessitating close follow-up.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Background:

  • Critically ill children require advanced life support, including Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO).
  • Understanding long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for ECMO survivors and similar critically ill children is crucial for patient management and care.
  • The 'near-miss ECMO' group provides a valuable comparison for assessing ECMO's specific impact.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the 5-year neurodevelopmental outcomes of children treated with ECMO versus those critically ill but not treated with ECMO (near-miss ECMO).
  • To assess cognitive function, preacademic skills, adaptive behavior, and risk for school failure in both groups.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort study comparing 76 five-year-old children treated with ECMO to 20 five-year-old near-miss ECMO patients with similar primary diagnoses.
  • Neurodevelopmental assessment included intelligence (IQ) testing, preacademic/academic skills evaluation, and parent-reported adaptive behavior.
  • Demographic data, ventilatory support, and hyperventilation were compared between groups.

Main Results:

  • Both ECMO and near-miss ECMO groups exhibited similar demographic data and primary diagnoses.
  • Cognitive outcomes were comparable, with mean Full-Scale IQ scores in the normal range (ECMO: 97, near-miss: 89).
  • Rates of severe mental handicap (12% vs. 11%) and risk for school failure (37% vs. 38%) were similar. Parents reported more immature adaptive skills in the near-miss group, though numbers were small.

Conclusions:

  • Children treated with ECMO and those who were critically ill but did not meet ECMO criteria (near-miss ECMO) demonstrate similar cognitive and adaptive outcomes at 5 years of age.
  • A significant proportion of children in both groups are at risk for school failure, highlighting the need for ongoing monitoring and support.
  • These findings suggest that factors beyond ECMO treatment itself significantly influence long-term neurodevelopmental trajectories in critically ill children.

Related Concept Videos