Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validity and utility of computer-based test interpretation.

J N Butcher1, J N Perry, M M Atlis

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA. butch001@tc.umn.edu

Psychological Assessment
|February 7, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temperature change and complex dynamics.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

FACTOR STRUCTURE O F THE MMPI IN A PSYCHIATRIC POPULATION.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A reappraisal of insect flight towards a distant point source of wind-borne odor.

Journal of chemical ecology·2014
Same author

Compounds modifying the activity of two sex attractants for males of the pea moth,Cydia nigricana (F.).

Journal of chemical ecology·2014
Same author

Ultrasound of penetrating ocular injury in a combat environment.

Clinical radiology·2012
Same author

Determinants of dynamics: Population size, stability and persistence.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011
Same journal

Modeling of parent-rated psychopathology in children and adolescents using the Child Behavior Checklist.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Racial differences in static and dynamic sexual risk assessment instruments: Static-99R and Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Maladaptive exercise: A psychometric investigation.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Depression and suicidal ideation and behavior measurement invariance: A comparison of foreign-born and U.S.-born service members.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal measurement invariance and psychometric properties of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS), Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS), and Positive Emotion Scale (PES) among community-dwelling adults.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same journal

Differential utility of immediate versus delayed memory measures for the identification of episodic memory impairment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Psychological assessment·2026
See all related articles

Computerized assessment methods in psychology are expanding. While valuable adjuncts to clinical judgment, computer-generated reports require further research for broader adoption in psychological testing.

Area of Science:

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychological Measurement
  • Computational Psychology

Background:

  • Computers have become integral to applied psychology.
  • Computerized methods in psychology have significantly expanded in scope and depth.
  • This evolution necessitates an examination of current computer-based assessment practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore recent applications of computer-based assessment methods.
  • To examine the validity of these computerized tools.
  • To discuss the comparability of computer-administered tests with traditional formats.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent literature on computer-based assessment.
  • Analysis of decision-making applications in psychiatric screening, personality assessment, neuropsychology, and personnel psychology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Summarization of studies on the accuracy of computerized narrative reports.

    • Main Results:

    • Computer-based assessment methods are increasingly utilized across various psychological domains.
    • Computer-generated reports show promise but are best used as supplements to, not replacements for, expert clinical judgment.
    • Comparisons between computerized and traditional tests are discussed, alongside accuracy studies.

    Conclusions:

    • Computer-generated reports are valuable adjuncts to clinical judgment in psychological assessment.
    • Further research is required to support the widespread implementation of computer-based testing.
    • The validity and comparability of these methods warrant continued investigation.