Low dose antithymocyte globulins in renal transplantation: daily versus intermittent administration based on T-cell...

Despite the long history of use of antithymocyte globulins (ATG) in renal transplantation, ideal doses and duration of ATG administration based on the monitoring of T lymphocytes have yet to be defined.

Two immunosuppressive regimens based on low-dose rabbit ATG (Thymoglobuline; Imtix-Sang-stat, Lyon, France) were assessed during the first year after transplantation: daily ATG (DATG; n=23) where 50 mg of ATG was given every day and intermittent ATG (IATG; n=16) where similar doses of ATG were given for the first 3 days and then intermittently only if CD3+ T lymphocytes (measured by flow cytometry) were > 10/mm3. Both groups received steroids, azathioprine, and cyclosporine.

ATG-induced depletion was similar for peripheral blood lymphocytes and T cells in both groups: it began at day 1 after transplantation, was submaximal at day 3, and reached maximum intensity between days 6 and 8, from which time cell counts progressively increased. However, T-cell depletion was still present at day 20. The total ATG dose per patient (381.5+/-121 vs. 564+/-135 mg/patient) and the mean cumulative daily dose of ATG (0.60+/-0.17 vs. 0.80+/-0.14 mg/kg/day) were significantly lower in the IATG group (P=0.0001 and 0.0006, respectively). The overlap of ATG and cyclosporine treatment was 6.7+/-3 vs. 7.4+/-4.3 days (P=NS), and the mean duration of ATG therapy was 11.3+/-3.2 vs. 11.6+/-2.7 days in the IATG and DATG groups, respectively (P=NS). ATG was given in an average of one dose every 1.6 days in the IATG group compared with one dose daily in the DATG group (P=7 x 10(-7)). There was no significant difference in renal graft function, the number of acute graft rejections, or ATG-related side effects and complications. Despite the daily immunological follow-up, there was a net saving of $760/patient in the cost of treatment in the IATG group.

IATG had the advantage of a reduction in the dose of ATG and in the cost of treatment, while offering similar T-cell depletion and effective immunosuppression. This approach could be proposed as an induction protocol, particularly for patients with poor graft function in whom cyclosporine introduction has to be delayed or those with increased risk of cytomegalovirus infections or secondary malignancies.