Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalized neural field theory of cortical plasticity illustrated by an application to the linear phase of ocular dominance column formation in primary visual cortex.

Biological cybernetics·2021
Same author

[Contemporary issues in the recording of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials].

Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery·2018
Same author

The caloric irrigation test.

Handbook of clinical neurology·2016
Same author

Determination of effective brain connectivity from functional connectivity with application to resting state connectivities.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Geometric effects on complex network structure in the cortex.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Developments in artificial insemination of dairy cattle.

The Cornell veterinarian·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 28, 2026

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

A re-evaluation of tinnitus reliability testing.

G P Jacobson1, J A Henderson, D L McCaslin

  • 1Division of Audiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|February 7, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Normal listeners imagining tinnitus report higher loudness than patients with actual tinnitus. This suggests subjective loudness perception differs between feigned and real tinnitus experiences.

More Related Videos

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2026

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents
09:23

A Low Cost Setup for Behavioral Audiometry in Rodents

Published on: October 16, 2012

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans
07:28

A Protocol of Manual Tests to Measure Sensation and Pain in Humans

Published on: December 19, 2016

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Tinnitus Research

Background:

  • Tinnitus, an auditory perception of sound without an external source, affects millions globally.
  • Accurate loudness measurement is crucial for understanding tinnitus and developing treatments.
  • Subjective reporting of tinnitus loudness can be influenced by various factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess tinnitus loudness perception in healthy individuals feigning tinnitus.
  • To compare loudness judgments between feigning individuals and actual tinnitus patients.
  • To investigate factors influencing loudness matching in both groups.

Main Methods:

  • Healthy participants and tinnitus patients underwent loudness matching tasks.
  • Participants imagined a constant monaural tonal tinnitus.
  • Loudness judgments were recorded with and without external references and across different time intervals and frequencies.

Main Results:

  • Normal listeners feigning tinnitus reported significantly higher loudness, especially without external references, after a week, and for low frequencies.
  • Tinnitus patients showed no significant differences in loudness judgments across sessions or frequencies.
  • Variability in loudness matching was similar between feigning normals and tinnitus patients within sessions and over a week.

Conclusions:

  • Healthy individuals asked to feign tinnitus tend to overestimate loudness compared to tinnitus patients.
  • External references, time intervals, and tone frequency impact feigned tinnitus loudness perception.
  • Findings highlight potential differences in subjective loudness perception between feigned and genuine tinnitus.