Evaluation of different methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in Poland

The aim of this study was to compare different methods for C. difficile toxins detection. Fifty three stool samples taken from patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhoea were studied. TCD toxin A EIA (Becton Dickinson, USA), Tox A/B ELISA test (TechLab, USA), cytotoxicity and neutralization assay on McCoy cells and PCR for detection of both toxin A and B genes were performed in vivo (in stool samples) and in vitro (in isolated strains). Reference toxigenic and nontoxigenic and two Japanese toxin A-negative and toxin B-positive C. difficile strains were used as a controls. TCD toxin A EIA detected in vivo only 19 positive samples. Tox A/B test detected 52 positive samples out of 53 studied. All 53 stool samples were C. difficile culture positive (53 strains were cultured). Toxin B was detected in 52 strain-supernatants and in all controls (except the nontoxigenic one). Both toxin A and B genes were detected by PCR in all 53 isolated strains, Japanese and reference strain (except the nontoxigenic one). In vitro toxin A was detected by TCD toxin A EIA in 42 strains. These results were compared with those obtained in Tox A/B ELISA test. We observed 52 positive strains. Toxigenic reference strain and two Japanese toxA(-)/toxB(+) strains were also positive. Only 2 negative results were obtained with the nontoxigenic reference strain and unique nontoxigenic isolated strain. Tox A/B ELISA test seems to be the best for detection of C. difficile toxins in vivo and in vitro. Test avoids the false-negative results in the case of presence of toxin A-negative and toxin B-positive strain.