Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026
Thermal Ablation for the Treatment of Abdominal Tumors
Published on: March 7, 2011
Local recurrence after laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors
A Siperstein1, A Garland, K Engle
1Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Background:
Since we first described laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LRFA) of liver tumors, several reports have documented technical and safety aspects of this procedure. Little is known, however, about the long-term follow-up of such patients.
Methods:
From January 1996 to February 1999, we performed LRFA on 250 liver tumors in 66 patients. Triphasic spiral computed tomographic scanning was obtained preoperatively and at 1 week, and every 3 months postoperatively. Lesion diameter was measured in the x- and y-axes and the volume estimated; 181 lesions in 43 patients for whom computed tomographic scans available were included in the study. The tumor types were as follows: 64 metastatic adenocarcinomas, 79 neuroendocrine metastases, 27 other metastases, and 11 primary liver tumors.
Results:
One week postoperatively, the ablated zone was larger than the original tumor in 178 of 181 lesions, which suggests ablation of the tumor and a margin of normal liver tissue. A progressive decline in lesion size was seen in 156 (88%) of 178 lesions, followed for at least 3 months (mean, 13.9 months; range, 4.9-37.8 months), which suggests resorption of the ablated tissue. Fourteen definite local treatment failures were apparent by increase in size and change in computed tomographic scan appearance, and eight lesions were scored as failures because of multifocal recurrence that encroached on ablated foci (22 total recurrences). Predictors of failure include lack of increased lesion size at 1 week (2 of 3 such lesions failed), adenocarcinoma or sarcoma (18 of 22 failures; P < .05), larger tumors (failures, M = 18 cm3 vs. successes, M = 7 cm3; P < .005) and vascular invasion on laparoscopic ultrasonography. By size criteria, 17 of 22 failures were apparent by 6 months. Energy delivered per gram of tissue was not significantly different (P = .45).
Conclusions:
LRFA has a 12% local failure rate, with larger adenocarcinomas and sarcomas at greatest risk. Failures occur early in follow-up, with most occurring by 6 months. LRFA seems to be a safe and effective treatment technique for patients with primary and metastatic liver malignancies.
