Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer].

C Viville

    Annales D'Urologie
    |April 14, 2000
    PubMed
    Summary

    Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer shows high local recurrence rates (20-40%). Reappraisal is needed to assess the oncological benefit of this procedure and optimize management of biological or clinical recurrences.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Intestinal perforations in percutaneous surgery of the kidney].

    Annales d'urologie·1995
    Same author

    [Vesico-intestinal fistulas].

    Annales d'urologie·1995
    Same author

    [Prostatic or urethral rectal fistulas].

    Annales d'urologie·1995
    Same author

    [Intestinal urinary fistulas of renal and pelvis origin].

    Annales d'urologie·1995
    Same author

    [Rectal injuries in radical prostatectomies for cancer. Survey of the ANFUC (Association National de Formation Urologique Continue) 1994].

    Journal d'urologie·1995
    Same author

    [Total prostatectomy for cancer. Mortality and morbidity. Apropos of 1288 operations. The ANFUC survey].

    Journal d'urologie·1994

    Area of Science:

    • Urologic Oncology
    • Surgical Oncology
    • Radiation Oncology

    Context:

    • Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has a significant local recurrence rate, ranging from 20% to 40%.
    • Distinguishing between biological (PSA elevation) and clinical (palpable/visualized abnormalities) recurrences is crucial for treatment decisions.
    • Variability in PSA assay sensitivity and clinical underestimation of pathological stage complicate recurrence evaluation.

    Purpose:

    • To re-evaluate the oncological utility of radical prostatectomy as a standalone treatment for prostate cancer.
    • To analyze the definitions and management strategies for local recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    • To assess the efficacy of salvage radiation therapy for local prostate cancer recurrence.

    Summary:

    • Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy can manifest as biological (PSA rise) or clinical (physical findings) events.
    • Salvage radiation therapy is often considered for local recurrences, but its efficacy is debated, with variable success rates reported.
    • PSA kinetics (rate of rise, doubling time) are valuable for monitoring recurrence, and hormone therapy should be used cautiously to preserve its diagnostic utility.

    Impact:

    • Highlights the need for a critical appraisal of radical prostatectomy's role in achieving a complete cure for prostate cancer.
    • Emphasizes the importance of standardized PSA assays and accurate staging for reliable recurrence assessment.
    • Suggests radiation therapy as a primary option for local recurrence, while cautioning against early use of hormone therapy.

    Related Experiment Videos