Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conditional uncertainty analysis and implications for decision making: the case of WIPP.

M E Paté-Cornell1

  • 1Stanford University, California 94305, USA.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|April 15, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Conditional uncertainty analyses can be misinterpreted, leading to flawed risk assessments. This study examines how conservative assumptions in risk curves and outcome intervals distort results, impacting decision-making and resource allocation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anesthesia patient risk: a quantitative approach to organizational factors and risk management options.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1997
Same author

The SAM framework: modeling the effects of management factors on human behavior in risk analysis.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1996
Same author

Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: the case of offshore platforms.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1990
Same author

Warning systems in risk management.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·1986

Area of Science:

  • Risk Assessment and Management
  • Decision Analysis
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Uncertainty analyses are crucial for risk management but can be misinterpreted.
  • Conditional analyses, using conservative assumptions, pose interpretation challenges.
  • Misinterpretation can lead to suboptimal decisions and resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the misinterpretation of conditional uncertainty analyses.
  • To analyze the impact of conservative assumptions on risk curve percentiles and outcome intervals.
  • To highlight challenges in comparing and using results from conditional analyses for policy-making.

Main Methods:

  • Examination of two cases of conditional uncertainty analysis.
  • Focus on conditional risk curves and intervals derived from conservative assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustration using the performance assessment of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP).

    • Main Results:

    • Conditional risk curves may be misinterpreted as marginal distributions, underestimating true risk.
    • Intervals from conservative assumptions obscure the likelihood of outcomes and possible benign scenarios.
    • Results from conditional analyses are difficult to compare with other risk assessments.

    Conclusions:

    • Conditional uncertainty analyses require careful interpretation to avoid misrepresenting risk.
    • Conservative assumptions can distort risk perception, impacting policy and decision-making.
    • Standardized methods for reporting conditional analyses are needed for better comparability and use.