Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differentiation between true microembolic signals and artefacts using an arbitrary sample volume.

D Georgiadis1, F Uhlmann, A Lindner

  • 1Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany. dimitrios.georgiadis@medizin.uni-halle.de

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
|April 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new technique to distinguish microemboli (MES) from artefact signals using intensity changes. The method achieved high sensitivity and specificity, proving effective for monitoring brain blood flow.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Search for Axion Dark Matter with a MADMAX Prototype.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

First Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter with a madmax Prototype.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Comparative Analysis of Analog and Digital Chest Tube Drainage Systems Using a High-Fidelity 3D-Printed Neonatal Chest Model.

Pediatric pulmonology·2025
Same author

Probing Strangeness Hadronization with Event-by-Event Production of Multistrange Hadrons.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Measurements of Chemical Potentials in Pb-Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Observation of Medium-Induced Yield Enhancement and Acoplanarity Broadening of Low-p_{T} Jets from Measurements in pp and Central Pb-Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2024

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Distinguishing microemboli (MES) from artefacts is crucial for accurate neurological monitoring.
  • Existing methods may lack the sensitivity or specificity required for reliable differentiation.
  • Cerebral blood flow monitoring is essential in various clinical scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel technique for discriminating between microemboli (MES) and artefact signals.
  • To determine the optimal intensity change cut-off for differentiating MES and artefacts.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of this technique in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • Monitoring was conducted on the middle cerebral artery and brain parenchyma.
  • Intensity changes were measured as a percentage of proximal depth values.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A cut-off value was determined using a dataset of 250 MES and 250 artefact signals.
  • The technique was further validated in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and those with embolic sources.

    • Main Results:

    • Microemboli (MES) signals showed an 87% intensity change, while artefact signals showed a -58% change.
    • An optimal intensity cut-off value of 27% was identified.
    • Applied to over 3700 signals, the technique achieved 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity.
    • The method demonstrated high accuracy in differentiating MES from artefacts.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed technique effectively discriminates between microemboli (MES) and artefact signals.
    • The identified intensity cut-off provides high sensitivity and specificity.
    • This method shows promise for improving the accuracy of cerebral blood flow monitoring and warrants further investigation.