Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2026

Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
The serological status of Solomon Island blood donors
1Medical Unit, Honiara Central Hospital, Solomon Islands. Rick.Lucas@nt.gov.au
Insights
Hepatitis B and C infections were studied in Solomon Island blood donors. High prevalence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and syphilis was found, while Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody tests were likely false positives.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- The serological status of blood donors in the Solomon Islands was investigated in 1995.
- Focus was on the seroprevalence of antibodies to Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) and associated risk factors.
- Previous HIV screening of donors yielded no positive cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the seroprevalence of Hepatitis B and C antibodies in Solomon Island blood donors.
- To identify risk factors associated with these chronic infections.
- To assess the reliability of third-generation HCV EIA antibody tests in this population.
Main Methods:
- Serum samples from 598 blood donors were collected and tested for HCV antibodies using EIA and RIBA, with PCR for confirmation.
- Hepatitis B infection markers (HBsAg, anti-HBc antibody) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were assessed.
- Questionnaires collected data on risk factors; syphilis (TPHA, RPR) and HTLV-1 antibodies were also tested.
Main Results:
- 36 samples (6.0%) were positive for HCV antibodies by EIA, but only 3 were RIBA positive and none PCR positive, suggesting high false-positive rates.
- Hepatitis B infection was highly prevalent: 25.1% were HBsAg positive, and 84.4% had anti-HBc antibodies.
- Syphilis markers were detected in 15.4% (TPHA) and 5.4% (RPR ≥1), and 12.3% showed indeterminate HTLV-1 results.
Conclusions:
- Third-generation HCV EIA antibody tests likely produce frequent false positives in this region, consistent with studies from malaria-prone areas.
- High prevalence rates of Hepatitis B virus (HBV), yaws, and syphilis infections were demonstrated in the donor population.
- Further investigation is needed to confirm the accuracy of serological tests and understand the epidemiology of these infections in the Solomon Islands.
Abstract:
The serological status of Solomon Island blood donors in 1995 and in particular the seroprevalence of antibodies to Hepatitis B and C and prevalence of risk factors for these chronic infections was studied. A questionnaire of risk factors for Hepatitis B and C was undertaken. All blood donors had been previously screened for HIV antibody without any positive cases recorded. 598 donors had serum collected of which 36 samples (6.0%) were third generation HCV EIA antibody positive and 3 samples were RIBA positive but none were PCR positive. 25.1% of samples were positive for HBsAg and anti-HBc antibody was found in 84.4%. Elevated ALT levels (>35 U/l) were found in 6.5% of samples but there was no statistically significant association with HCV or HBsAg status. 15.4% were TPHA positive and 5.4% had RPR titers more than or equal to 1. Anti-HTLV-1 antibody was positive in 12.3% randomly selected samples. All 10 positive samples were then found to be antibody indeterminate with Western blot assay. Of the 585 samples with completed questionnaires, analysis of the relationship between anti-HCV status with tattoo status and ear piercing also failed to reach statistical significance. Consistent with other studies from tropical malaria-prone countries, a positive anti-HCV antibody test even by the third generation EIA is probably a false positive test in most cases. In addition, high prevalence rates of HBV, yaws or syphilis infection were demonstrated.
More Related Videos
06:03Whole Blood Assay with Dual Co-Stimulation for Antigen-Specific Analysis of Host Immunity to Fungal and Viral Pathogens
Published on: September 20, 2024
04:43COVID-19 Seroprevalence Test for IgG Antibody Levels Among Healthy Donors Across Different Pandemic Phases in Jeddah
Published on: June 24, 2025