Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose-response analyses of experimental cancer data.

R L Melnick1, M C Kohn

  • 1Laboratory of Computational Biology and Risk Analysis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. melnickr@niehs.nih.gov

Drug Metabolism Reviews
|April 25, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Dose-response analysis helps understand cancer risks from chemicals like butadiene and chloroprene. Advanced models reveal that factors beyond simple chemical levels in tissues influence cancer development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitochondrial DNA sequence and phylogenetic evaluation of geographically disparate Sus scrofa breeds.

Animal biotechnology·2014
Same author

Structure-activity relationships for perfluoroalkane-induced in vitro interference with rat liver mitochondrial respiration.

Toxicology letters·2013
Same author

Detection and expression of enterotoxin genes in endophytic strains of Bacillus cereus.

Letters in applied microbiology·2012
Same author

Studies of nephrotoxic agents in an improved renal proximal tubule system.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
Same author

Biochemical origins of the non-monotonic receptor-mediated dose-response.

Journal of molecular endocrinology·2002
Same author

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for inhalation and intravenous administration of naphthalene in rats and mice.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Carcinogenesis
  • Pharmacokinetics

Background:

  • Dose-response analysis is crucial for cancer data interpretation, risk assessment, and mechanistic evaluation.
  • Accurate characterization of dose and response terms is vital for reliable interpretation.
  • Existing methods may require adjustments for complex tumor development patterns, such as early-onset lethal lymphomas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine dose-response analysis for experimental cancer data, particularly for chemicals like butadiene and chloroprene.
  • To investigate the role of toxicokinetics and metabolic intermediates in chemical carcinogenesis.
  • To evaluate the predictive value of cytotoxicity and cell proliferation for tumor induction.

Main Methods:

  • Applied the poly-3 quantal response method to adjust for early tumor development in butadiene-exposed mice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized Weibull models to analyze survival-adjusted tumor data for butadiene and chloroprene.
  • Developed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for butadiene and isoprene to assess internal dosimetry.
  • Examined dose-response relationships for cytotoxicity, regenerative hyperplasia, and tumor induction by trihalomethanes.

    • Main Results:

    • The poly-3 method improved dose-response representation for late-developing tumors induced by butadiene.
    • Weibull modeling suggested similar carcinogenic potencies for butadiene and chloroprene in mice.
    • PBPK analysis indicated that differences in butadiene's carcinogenic effects between rats and mice are not solely explained by epoxybutene tissue concentrations.
    • Isoprene epoxides in blood were better indicators of kidney cancer risk than isoprene exposure levels.
    • Cell proliferation was not a reliable predictor of tumor response for trihalomethanes.

    Conclusions:

    • Refined dose-response methodologies enhance the understanding of chemical carcinogenicity.
    • Internal dosimetry and factors beyond metabolite concentrations are critical in chemical carcinogenesis.
    • The relationship between cellular responses and tumor induction can be complex and chemical-specific.