Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Illusions in reasoning about consistency
P N Johnson-Laird1, P Legrenzi, V Girotto
1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. phil@princeton.edu
Abstract:
Reasoners succumb to predictable illusions in evaluating whether sets of assertions are consistent. We report two studies of this computationally intractable task of "satisfiability." The results show that as the number of possibilities compatible with the assertions increases, the difficulty of the task increases, and that reasoners represent what is true according to assertions, not what is false. This procedure avoids overloading memory, but it yields illusions of consistency and of inconsistency. These illusions modify our picture of human rationality.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Hindsight Biases
Fundamental Attribution Error
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Correspondence Bias
Motivational Bias

