Prospective remembering of Korsakoffs and alcoholics as a function of the prospective-memory and on-going tasks

Prospective memory is assumed to rely more on the frontal lobes than retrospective memory. Since Korsakoff patients are known to suffer from a general cerebral atrophy and a frontal lobe atrophy in particular, they are expected to show considerably impaired prospective memory. In Experiment 1, the performance of Korsakoff patients on a semantic prospective-memory task (which was embedded in a perceptual on-going task) was particularly bad in Session 1; in Session 2, the Korsakoff patients improved substantially, to reach the performance level of nonamnesic alcoholics. In Experiment 2, prospective memory of the Korsakoff patients and nonamnesic alcoholics was better when the on-going task was more similar to the prospective-memory task; particularly striking was the much better prospective memory in the semantic prospective-memory task when the on-going task requires a semantic analysis than when the on-going task requires perceptual processing. The findings are in agreement with a task-appropriate processing explanation but also in partial agreement with the attention hypothesis of the instance theory of automaticity. Contrary to the frontal lobe hypothesis, prospective memory of the Korsakoff patients was surprisingly good in several aspects of the two experiments.