Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The reverse Stroop effect.

F H Durgin1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, PA 19081, USA. fdurgin1@swarthmore.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|April 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The classic Stroop effect, a delay in color naming, largely disappears when participants point to matching colors. However, pointing to color patches named by incongruent words causes significant interference, suggesting response compatibility influences Stroop effects.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual aftereffects of sequential perception: dynamic adaptation to changes in texture density and contrast.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Texture contrast aftereffects are monocular; texture density aftereffects are binocular.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Visuomotor adaptation without vision?

Experimental brain research·1999
Same author

Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures.

Vision research·1998
Same author

Global precedence in visual search? Not so fast: evidence instead for an oblique effect.

Perception·1997
Same author

Visual aftereffect of texture density contigent on color of frame.

Perception & psychophysics·1996
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • The Stroop interference task traditionally involves delayed manual or oral identification of colors when presented with incongruent color words.
  • Previous research suggests automatic processing or habit strength contribute to this interference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of response compatibility in Stroop interference.
  • To examine how different response modalities (pointing vs. naming) affect Stroop effects.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a modified Stroop task where responses involved either naming the color of a word or pointing to a matching color patch.
  • The study manipulated the congruence between the word's color and the word itself.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Stroop interference was minimal when participants pointed to a matching color patch.
  • A significant reverse Stroop effect was observed in the pointing task, with incongruent color words delaying responses.
  • Incongruent color words strongly interfered with pointing to a color patch named by the word.

Conclusions:

  • Stroop effects appear to be primarily driven by response compatibility of irrelevant information.
  • Automatic processing or habit strength may not be the sole or primary cause of Stroop interference.
  • The modality of the response is a critical factor in determining the presence and nature of Stroop interference.