Changes in the auditory evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil

I A Iselin-Chaves1, H E El Moalem, T J Gan

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Anesthesiology
|April 26, 2000
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) changes correlate with sedation and predict loss of consciousness, similar to the bispectral index (BIS). MLAEP latencies are particularly effective predictors, even with opioid co-administration.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology and Neurophysiology
  • Pharmacology and Drug Monitoring

Background:

  • Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) exhibit dose-dependent changes with hypnotics but not opioids.
  • The study aimed to evaluate the combined effects of hypnotics and opioids on MLAEP.
  • Comparison of MLAEP with the bispectral index (BIS) for sedation and loss of consciousness prediction was also conducted.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of propofol and alfentanil combination on MLAEP.
  • To compare the predictive capabilities of MLAEP and BIS for sedation levels.
  • To determine the reliability of MLAEP in predicting loss of consciousness during anesthesia.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty healthy volunteers received escalating propofol doses, with or without alfentanil.
  • MLAEP, BIS, sedation scores, and drug concentrations were recorded at various levels.
  • Correlation and prediction probability (Pk) analyses were performed for MLAEP and BIS.

Main Results:

  • Both BIS and MLAEP showed significant changes with increasing sedation (P < 0.0001).
  • BIS correlated better with sedation scores (0.884) than MLAEP (P < 0.05).
  • Pa and Nb latencies demonstrated the strongest MLAEP correlation with sedation (0.685, 0.658) and comparable prediction of unconsciousness to BIS.

Conclusions:

  • MLAEP changes correlate with propofol-induced sedation, independent of opioid presence.
  • Pa and Nb latencies of MLAEP are superior predictors of increasing sedation and loss of consciousness.
  • MLAEP serves as a viable tool for monitoring anesthetic depth, comparable to BIS.

Related Concept Videos

Stages of General Anesthesia01:22

Stages of General Anesthesia

Various sedation levels offer significant advantages in facilitating procedural interventions for patients undergoing medical or invasive surgical procedures. These levels span from anxiolysis to general anesthesia, providing a spectrum of sedative effects to cater to specific patient needs. Anxiolysis reduces anxiety and is achieved through minimal sedation, enabling patients to remain awake and responsive while feeling more at ease during the procedure. This level can benefit minor...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview01:24

Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview

Intravenous anesthetics are drugs administered parenterally to induce anesthesia or sedation. Propofol is a widely used agent formulated as a 1% emulsion in soybean oil, glycerol, and egg phosphatide. It induces rapid anesthesia primarily due to its rapid distribution from the bloodstream to target tissues and is metabolized in the liver. However, it can cause significant pain on injection and hypertriglyceridemia. Fospropofol, a water-based prodrug of propofol, lacks these adverse effects.
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview01:20

Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview

Inhalation anesthetics are drugs that induce general anesthesia upon inhalation. They work by increasing the sensitivity of GABAA receptors or inhibiting NMDA receptors, leading to a decrease in central nervous system activity. The depth of anesthesia can be rapidly adjusted by changing the concentration of the inhaled gas. Some common examples of inhalational anesthetics include volatile liquids like isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane and gases like xenon and nitrous oxide. Isoflurane, a...