Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Death--whose decision? Euthanasia and the terminally ill.

S I Fraser1, J W Walters

  • 1Loma Linda University, California, USA.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|April 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proceedings of meeting of Irish Society for Gastroenterology.

Irish journal of medical science·2016
Same author

Photoreceptor responses of patients with congenital stationary night blindness.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Short wavelength-automated perimetry compared with standard achromatic perimetry in autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same author

The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2001
Same author

Psychophysical comparison of four automated perimeters.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1993
Same author

Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·1992
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Physician-assisted dying laws faced opposition but were upheld in Oregon, USA, unlike Australia. Allowing patient autonomy for the terminally ill reduces ethical conflicts and preserves dignity.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law
  • End-of-Life Care

Background:

  • Legislation for physician-assisted dying was enacted in Australia and Oregon, USA.
  • Significant opposition, often religiously motivated, led to repeal in Australia.
  • Oregon reaffirmed physician-assisted dying by a 60-40% vote despite formidable opposition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the conflict between advancing end-of-life medical technology and traditional/religious sanctity-of-life values.
  • To compare potential contradictions and arbitrary decisions when patient autonomy is permitted versus forbidden.
  • To discuss implications of new legislation on human experience.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative legal and ethical analysis of physician-assisted dying legislation in Australia and Oregon.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaDeath with Dignity Act (Oregon)Legal ApproachRights of the Terminally Ill Act (Northern Territory)

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of societal values, particularly personal autonomy in the United States.
  • Discussion of the interplay between technological medical advances and ethical/religious beliefs.

    • Main Results:

    • Legislation permitting physician-assisted dying faced significant challenges rooted in religious and sanctity-of-life values.
    • Patient autonomy, highly valued in the US, presents complex ethical considerations when balanced against these values.
    • Allowing autonomy for terminally ill patients within defined limits appears to minimize ethical contradictions.

    Conclusions:

    • Allowing patient autonomy in end-of-life decisions, within defined parameters, leads to fewer ethical contradictions.
    • Granting autonomy to terminally ill patients better preserves human dignity.
    • The study highlights the need to reconcile medical advancements with deeply held societal and religious values.