Related Experiment Videos
Paying research subjects: participants' perspectives
M L Russell1, D G Moralejo, E D Burgess
1University of Calgary, Canada.
Journal of Medical Ethics
|April 29, 2000
Summary
Most unpaid healthy volunteers do not support payment for research participation. They believe recognition for time and effort, rather than direct payment, is more appropriate for study volunteers.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research Ethics
- Participant Recruitment and Retention
Background:
- Ethical considerations surrounding participant compensation in clinical trials are complex.
- Understanding the perspectives of healthy volunteers is crucial for informed consent and recruitment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the opinions of unpaid healthy volunteers regarding the compensation of research subjects.
- To identify factors influencing volunteer attitudes towards payment for research participation.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study involving medically eligible individuals recruited for a vaccine trial.
- Data collected via questionnaires at baseline and follow-up, including responses to closed-ended and open-ended questions on payment.
- Content analysis used to categorize themes from participant comments.
Main Results:
- A minority (43.3%) of healthy volunteers agreed with paying participants.
- Opinions on payment for research subjects remained consistent over time.
- Key themes included the benefits and drawbacks of participation and payment, acceptable conditions for compensation (e.g., recruitment issues, cost reimbursement), and appropriate forms of recognition (monetary and non-monetary).
Conclusions:
- The majority of unpaid healthy volunteers expressed disagreement with compensating research participants.
- Volunteer perspectives highlight the importance of recognizing participants' time and effort, aligning with ethical discussions.
- Greater emphasis on acknowledging participant contributions is recommended.