Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding peer education: insights from a process evaluation.

K Backett-Milburn1, S Wilson

  • 1Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Health Education Research
|May 2, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of the secondary school setting on the food practices of young teenagers from disadvantaged backgrounds in Scotland.

Health education research·2004
Same author

Practising what we preach? A practical approach to bringing research, policy and practice together in relation to children and health inequalities.

Health education research·2003
Same author

A G protein-coupled receptor for UDP-glucose.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2001
Same author

Initial management strategies for dyspepsia.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2000
Same author

Eradication of helicobacter pylori for non-ulcer dyspepsia.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2000
Same author

Near-patient tests in primary care: setting the standards for evaluation.

Journal of health services research & policy·2000
Same journal

Effectiveness of support-based interventions on self-efficacy in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Health education research·2026
Same journal

Supporting responsive feeding in early childhood education centres: a process evaluation of the CELEBRATE feeding intervention using the RE-AIM framework.

Health education research·2026
Same journal

Dataset development and performance analysis of a specialized conversational artificial intelligence model for targeted smoking cessation dialogues.

Health education research·2026
Same journal

Improving health literacy on betel nut and oral cancer: a qualitative exploration of resource adaptation for diverse Victorian communities.

Health education research·2026
Same journal

The intersectionality of gender and location in health education access in Chinese vocational high schools.

Health education research·2026
Same journal

Health education interventions to reduce cannabis and tobacco smoking-related harms among people who use cannabis: a systematic review.

Health education research·2026
See all related articles

Peer education is a popular health promotion strategy for young people in the UK, but evaluations are scarce. This study offers insights into a peer education project focusing on sexual health, HIV/AIDS, and drugs.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Health Promotion
  • Adolescent Health

Background:

  • Peer education is widely used for youth health promotion in the UK.
  • Evaluations of peer education effectiveness, especially qualitative ones, are underreported globally.
  • This study addresses the gap by evaluating a peer education project in Scotland.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present insights from a process evaluation of a peer education project.
  • To explore new approaches in youth health promotion concerning sexual health, HIV/AIDS, and drugs.
  • To contribute to a better understanding of peer education processes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an illuminative, qualitative process evaluation approach.
  • Employed an interactive and responsive evaluation methodology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Described factors influencing the peer education process.

    • Main Results:

    • Detailed the interactive and responsive nature of the evaluation.
    • Identified key influencing factors: recruitment, setting, organizational context, and participant development.
    • Discussed the formal and informal roles of peer educators.

    Conclusions:

    • The paper offers insights into the process evaluation of a youth peer education project.
    • It highlights factors critical to the success of peer-led health promotion.
    • This work aims to foster deeper reflection on peer education dynamics.