Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Strategies for comparing treatments on a binary response with multi-centre data.

A Agresti1, J Hartzel

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-8545, USA. AA@STAT.UFL.EDU

Statistics in Medicine
|May 3, 2000
PubMed
Summary

This study reviews methods for comparing treatments with binary outcomes across multiple centers. It addresses challenges in summarizing differences, making inferences, and handling sparse data in multi-center clinical trials.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Author Correction: Titanium-carbide MXenes for work function and interface engineering in perovskite solar cells.

Nature materials·2019
Same author

Titanium-carbide MXenes for work function and interface engineering in perovskite solar cells.

Nature materials·2019
Same author

A dose ranging study of 2 different formulations of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) in healthy infants.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2019
Same author

Graphene-Induced Improvements of Perovskite Solar Cell Stability: Effects on Hot-Carriers.

Nano letters·2019
Same author

Nucleosome loss facilitates the chemotactic response of macrophages.

Journal of internal medicine·2014
Same author

Hepatitis B virus blood screening: impact of nucleic amplification technology testing implementation on identifying hepatitis B surface antigen non-reactive window period and chronic infections.

Vox sanguinis·2010

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Comparing treatments with binary outcomes across multiple strata is common in multi-center clinical trials.
  • Analysis must account for potential treatment-by-center interactions and varying center sizes.
  • Sparse data, where centers have few successes or failures, presents unique analytical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey and discuss methods for analyzing binary treatment comparisons in multi-center settings.
  • To address key inferential questions including summarizing treatment differences and detecting interactions.
  • To explore strategies for handling sparse data and defining fixed vs. random effects for centers.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical methodologies for stratified binary data analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of methods for treatment effect estimation and hypothesis testing.
  • Exploration of techniques for interaction assessment and sparse data handling in multi-center trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Various strategies exist for summarizing treatment differences and making inferential comparisons.
    • Methods for investigating and describing treatment-by-center interactions are presented.
    • The paper highlights approaches to manage sparse data and the fixed/random effects debate for centers.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of analysis strategy depends on the research questions and data characteristics, especially sparsity.
    • Appropriate methods are crucial for valid inferences in multi-center studies with binary outcomes.
    • Addressing challenges like sparse data and interaction is key to robust clinical trial analysis.