Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laboratory automation: trajectory, technology, and tactics.

R S Markin1, S A Whalen

  • 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, 983135 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3135, USA. rmarkin@unmc.edu

Clinical Chemistry
|May 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agricultural pesticide use and adenocarcinomas of the stomach and oesophagus.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2004
Same author

Distinctive gene expression profiles associated with Hepatitis B virus x protein.

Oncogene·2001
Same author

Histopathologic evaluation of primary intestinal transplant recipients at autopsy: a single-center experience.

Transplantation proceedings·2000
Same author

Human parvovirus B19 infection in acute fulminant liver failure.

Archives of virology·1999
Same author

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on the florid duct lesion of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·1999
Same author

Correlation of mucosal disaccharidase activities with histology in evaluation of rejection following intestinal transplantation.

Pediatric transplantation·1999

This article reviews the evolution of laboratory automation, highlighting its shift from hardware-focused systems to software-driven, modular designs. It examines how economic pressures, changing healthcare needs, and technological advancements are shaping the adoption of these tools in clinical settings.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical laboratory automation systems research
  • Healthcare operations management within diagnostic medicine

Background:

No prior work has fully resolved the historical trajectory of clinical diagnostic systems. It was already known that information technology adoption mirrored early computing trends. That uncertainty drove the need to examine current operational shifts. Prior research has shown that aging populations and legislative changes impact service delivery. This gap motivated a deeper look at how diagnostic manufacturers respond to financial constraints. No comprehensive review had synthesized the transition from hardware-centric models to software-integrated platforms. That ambiguity prompted an analysis of how business processes influence technical design. This background establishes the context for understanding modern laboratory efficiency improvements.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to analyze the trajectory and technological evolution of clinical diagnostic systems. The authors seek to clarify how business processes and operational requirements drive current design philosophies. This gap motivated an examination of the shift from hardware-centric to software-based approaches. That uncertainty drove the need to understand the relationship between automation and healthcare delivery. No prior work had resolved the complexities of evaluating cost-effectiveness in this sector. This research addresses the challenges faced by diagnostic manufacturers under constant financial pressure. The authors intend to provide a framework for understanding the transition toward standardized, modular products. This purpose guides the synthesis of how modern tools influence the delivery of laboratory results.

Keywords:
clinical laboratory managementprocess control softwarediagnostic technology trendshealthcare operations

Frequently Asked Questions

The authors propose that laboratory automation improves services by utilizing software-based process control. This approach supports repeat testing, reflex testing, and transportation management, whereas older methods relied primarily on hardware-based designs.

The researchers identify process control software as a key component. This tool manages complex workflows, contrasting with earlier, less flexible hardware-driven systems that lacked integrated computer manufacturing capabilities.

The authors state that the interface between the automation system and the laboratory information system is necessary. This connection allows for functional interdependence, unlike isolated systems that fail to integrate with broader healthcare delivery data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach synthesizes historical trends and current operational practices in diagnostic settings. Authors examined the evolution of system design philosophies from hardware-based to software-integrated frameworks. The analysis incorporates perspectives on how legislative acts and demographic shifts influence service delivery. Researchers evaluated the role of diagnostic manufacturers in providing both instrument-coupled and independent solutions. The study reviews the transition from total system implementations to modular, standardized products. Investigators assessed the functional interdependence between automation platforms and existing information systems. The approach considers the impact of cost pressures on the profitability of diagnostic service providers. This methodology provides a comprehensive overview of the current state and future trajectory of the field.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature indicate that automation has shifted from total system designs to modular configurations. The authors report that software-based process control now dominates over hardware-centric approaches. Evidence suggests that the interface between automation and information systems is a critical functional requirement. The review highlights that cost-effectiveness remains difficult to quantify due to limited installation data. Findings show that diagnostic manufacturers are increasingly using these systems as marketing tools. The literature demonstrates that constant financial pressure forces providers to seek optimal service delivery models. Results confirm that acceptance of these technologies is rising despite challenges in measuring payback. The synthesis reveals that hardware and software are now functionally interdependent components in modern clinical environments.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that software-based control now defines the current state of diagnostic systems. They propose that hardware and software remain functionally linked in modern implementations. The researchers note that modular designs have largely replaced total system approaches. They argue that interface connectivity between distinct platforms remains a primary technical requirement. The authors observe that vendor-provided cost-effectiveness data currently lack sufficient precision for clear evaluation. They state that automation has transitioned from a novelty to a standard marketing instrument. The researchers emphasize that the industry continues to refine methods for measuring financial payback. They conclude that widespread acceptance of these technologies is steadily increasing across the sector.

The authors note that operational data serves as the primary evidence for determining financial payback. While vendors provide these metrics, the researchers argue that current data collection precision remains suboptimal for accurate assessment.

The researchers observe a shift from total laboratory automation toward modular approaches. This trend contrasts with previous strategies that favored comprehensive, one-of-a-kind installations that were difficult to standardize.

The authors claim that automation has evolved into a marketing tool for manufacturers. This differs from its initial role as a purely diagnostic novelty, reflecting the growing competitive nature of the clinical supply marketplace.