Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Development of ideomotor praxis representation.

C Njiokiktjien1, C A Verschoor, M Vranken

  • 1Paediatric Outpatients Clinic, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Njiokiktjien@azvu.nl

Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology
|May 5, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ontogenesis of laterality in 3- to 10-yr.-old children: increased unimanual independence grounded on improved bimanual motor function.

Perceptual and motor skills·2009
Same author

Ontogenetic trends in gnostic hand function in 3- to 12-yr-old children.

Perceptual and motor skills·2003
Same author

Facial identity and facial emotions: speed, accuracy, and processing strategies in children and adults.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2002
Same author

Children with non-verbal learning disabilities (NLD): coherence values in the resting state may reflect hypofunctional long distance connections in the right hemisphere.

Fiziologiia cheloveka·2001
Same author

Disordered recognition of facial identity and emotions in three Asperger type autists.

European child & adolescent psychiatry·2001
Same author

Attention deficits in children with low performance IQ: arguments for right hemisphere dysfunction.

Fiziologiia cheloveka·1998

This study developed a screening tool to assess ideomotor praxis representation (IPR) in children. The key finding is the developmental shift from concrete to symbolic action representation around age 6.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Motor control

Background:

  • Ideomotor praxis representation (IPR) is crucial for understanding action.
  • Developmental changes in IPR are not fully understood.
  • A screening tool is needed to assess IPR development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create and validate a short screening instrument for ideomotor praxis representation (IPR) in typically developing children.
  • To investigate the developmental trajectory of IPR from concrete to symbolic representation.
  • To establish the clinical relevance and age range for IPR screening.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated 357 typically developing children aged 2.5 to 9.5 years.
  • Developed a six-item mimed action screening test based on verbal requests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed the transition from body-as-object to imaginary-object performance.

    • Main Results:

    • The primary developmental change observed is the shift from concrete, egocentric performance to abstract, allocentric symbolic representation.
    • Significant differences in self-directed vs. externally directed gestures emerge before age 6.
    • Motor precision shows minimal improvement after age 6, distinct from symbolic representation development.
    • IPR screening is clinically relevant from 4.5 years onward.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed IPR screening instrument effectively captures developmental changes in action representation.
    • The findings highlight a critical developmental period for symbolic representation around age 6.
    • The tool provides a model for interpreting IPR levels in clinical settings, particularly from age 4.5 years.