Related Experiment Videos
Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low-birth-weight infants
1Paediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. aohlsson@globalserve.net or aohlsson@mtsinai.on.ca
Insights
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) significantly reduces sepsis and serious infections in preterm and low birth weight infants. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials confirms IVIG
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Immunology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Nosocomial infections pose a significant threat to preterm and low birth weight (LBW) infants due to limited passive immunity and delayed endogenous synthesis.
- Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration offers potential benefits by providing IgG, enhancing immune functions like opsonization and complement activation.
- IVIG may serve as a prophylactic or therapeutic agent against nosocomial infections in vulnerable infant populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in preventing nosocomial infections in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.
- To compare the outcomes of IVIG administration against placebo or no intervention in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- To assess the impact of IVIG on key neonatal outcomes including sepsis, serious infections, and mortality.
Main Methods:
- A systematic search of major databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library) was conducted in November 1997 for relevant RCTs.
- Inclusion criteria specified RCTs comparing IVIG to placebo/no intervention in preterm (<37 weeks) and/or LBW (<2500g) infants for infection prevention.
- Data extraction and analysis were performed by two independent reviewers, with results pooled using fixed-effects models; sensitivity analyses were conducted on high-quality studies.
Main Results:
- Fifteen RCTs involving 5,054 infants met the inclusion criteria.
- Combined analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in sepsis episodes (RR 0.83, RD -0.028, NNT 36) and any serious infection (RR 0.85, RD -0.032, NNT 31).
- Sensitivity analyses using high-quality studies confirmed these significant reductions in sepsis and serious infections, with no significant heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
- Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration is effective in reducing the incidence of sepsis and serious infections in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.
- The findings support the use of IVIG as a strategy to prevent nosocomial infections in this vulnerable neonatal population.
- High-quality evidence indicates a favorable risk-benefit profile for IVIG in preventing serious infections in neonates.
Background:
Nosocomial infections continue to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Maternal transport of immunoglobulins to the fetus mainly occurs after 32 weeks gestation and endogenous synthesis does not begin until several months after birth. Administration of intravenous immunoglobulin provides IgG that can bind to cell surface receptors, provide opsonic activity, activate complement, promote antibody dependent cytotoxicity, and improve neutrophilic chemoluminescence. Intravenous immunoglobulin thus has the potential of preventing or altering the course of nosocomial infections.
Objectives:
To assess the effectiveness/safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration (compared to placebo or no intervention) to preterm (< 37 weeks gestational age at birth) and/or low birth weight (LBW) (< 2500 g BW) infants in preventing nosocomial infections.
Search Strategy:
Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Reference Update Databases were searched in November 1997 using keywords: immunoglobulin and infant-newborn and random allocation or controlled trial or randomized controlled trial (RCT). The reference lists of identified RCTs, personal files and Science Citation Index were searched. No language restrictions were applied.
Selection Criteria:
The criteria used to select studies for inclusion in this overview were: 1) DESIGN: RCTs in which administration of IVIG was compared to a control group that received a placebo or no intervention. 2) POPULATION: preterm (< 37 weeks gestational age) and/or LBW (<2500 g) infants. 3) INTERVENTION: IVIG for the prevention of bacterial/fungal infection during initial hospital stay (8 days or longer). (Studies that were primarily designed to assess the effect of IVIG on humoral immune markers were excluded as were studies in which the follow-up period was one week or less). 4) At least one of the following outcomes was reported: sepsis, any serious infection, death from all causes, death from infection, length of hospital stay, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).
Data Collection And Analysis:
Two reviewers independently abstracted information for each outcome reported in each study, and one researcher (AO) checked for any discrepancies and pooled the results. Relative risk (RR) and Risk Difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed effects model are reported. When a statistically significant RD was found the number needed to treat (NNT) was also calculated with 95% CIs. The results include all accepted studies in which the outcome of interest was reported. When statistically significant heterogeneity was found for an outcome, secondary (sensitivity) analyses were performed including only studies of the highest quality.
Main Results:
Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. These included 5,054 preterm and/or LBW infants and reported on at least one of the outcomes of interest for this systematic review. When all studies were combined there was a statistically significant reduction in sepsis, one or more episodes [RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.72, 0.97); RD -0.028 (95% CI -0.006, -0.051); NNT 36 (95% CI 20, 167)]. There was significant between-study heterogeneity. When, in a sensitivity analysis, the high quality studies were combined, the results remained significant [RR 0.78 (95% CI 0.62, 0.98); RD -0.031(95% CI -0.003, -0.059); NNT 32 (95% CI 17, 333]. For this analysis there was no statistically significant between-study heterogeneity. A statistically significant reduction was also found for any serious infection, one or more episodes, when all studies were combined [RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.75, 0. 95); RD -0.032 (95% CI -0.010, -0.054,); NNT 31 (95% CI 19, 100). There was statistically significant between-study heterogeneity. When, in a sensitivity analysis, the high quality studies were combined the results remained statistically significant [RR 0.80 (95% CI