Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Progress and challenges in geochronology

Renne1, Ludwig, Karner

  • 1Berkeley Geochronology Center, USA.

Science Progress
|May 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Geochronology

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of the brady act on homicide and suicide rates

JAMA·2000
Same author

Photoionization of highly charged ions using an ECR ion source and undulator radiation

Physical review letters·2000
Same author

NMRLAB-Advanced NMR data processing in matlab

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2000
Same author

In Spite of the Chemist's Belief: Carbonic Acid Is Surprisingly Stable.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2000
Same author

Lunar impact history from (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating of glass spherules

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2000
Same author

Novel 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from highly saline brine sediments of kebrit deep, red Sea

Archives of microbiology·1999

Area of Science:

  • Geochronology
  • Isotope Geochemistry
  • Cosmochemistry

Background:

  • Technological advancements enhance precision in geologic time measurement.
  • Absolute accuracy of radioisotopic dating is limited by systematic errors.
  • Inexact decay constants affect the accuracy of radioisotopic ages.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the discrepancy between precision and accuracy in radioisotopic dating.
  • To identify the impact of inaccurate decay constants on geochronologic methods.
  • To propose solutions for improving the accuracy of geologic age determinations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of precision versus accuracy in radioisotopic dating techniques.
  • Evaluation of the influence of decay constant uncertainties on age calculations.
  • Review of scientific applications affected by dating inaccuracies, such as thermochronology and solar system evolution.

Main Results:

  • High precision in methods like 40Ar/39Ar dating is compromised by low absolute accuracy.
  • Systematic errors, particularly from decay constants, limit the reliability of radioisotopic ages.
  • Interdisciplinary research and shifted priorities are needed to address accuracy limitations.

Conclusions:

  • Improving the accuracy of geologic time measurement requires addressing fundamental uncertainties in decay constants.
  • Enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial for advancing geochronologic accuracy.
  • Future research should focus on refining decay constants and improving inter-method age comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos