Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mathematical models for predicting G-level tolerances.

R R Burton1

  • 1Human Effectiveness Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX, USA. rrbslb@aol.com

Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
|May 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Increased chronic acceleration exposure enhances work capacity.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001
Same author

Mathematical models for predicting straining G-level tolerances in reclined subjects.

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001
Same author

Can centrifugation at increased G be used to predict results of 0G?

Journal of gravitational physiology : a journal of the International Society for Gravitational Physiology·2001
Same author

Straining GOR tolerance determinations are a measure of G-duration not G-level tolerance.

Safe journal·2001
Same author

Mathematical models for predicting G-duration tolerances.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2000
Same author

Prevention of minor neck injuries in F-16 pilots.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·1999
Same journal

Goodbye to ASEM.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

AsMA - a worldwide organization.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

This month in aerospace medicine history.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

You're the flight surgeon: hypogonadism.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

You're the flight surgeon: fatigue.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
Same journal

Manned-unmanned teaming: expanding the envelope of UAS operational employment.

Aviation, space, and environmental medicine·2014
See all related articles

Mathematical models predict human G-level tolerances during rapid and gradual onset situations, incorporating factors like anti-G suits and positive pressure breathing. These models enhance understanding of physiological responses to high G-forces.

Area of Science:

  • Aerospace Medicine
  • Human Physiology
  • Mathematical Modeling

Background:

  • High G-forces pose significant risks to human physiology, particularly in aviation and space exploration.
  • Understanding G-level tolerances is crucial for ensuring crew safety and mission success.
  • Existing models often lack comprehensive integration of various physiological countermeasures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate mathematical models predicting human G-level tolerances.
  • To incorporate key physiological factors and countermeasures into G-tolerance prediction.
  • To differentiate between G-level and G-duration tolerances.

Main Methods:

  • Development of mathematical models incorporating functions for anti-G suits, positive pressure breathing (PBG), baroreceptor reflex, handgrip reflex, anti-G straining maneuver (AGSM), leg elevation, and reclining seatback angles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Physiologic principles underpin the model's functional components.
  • Model predictions were validated against published data.

    • Main Results:

    • The models accurately predict human G-level tolerances for rapid onset relaxed (ROR), gradual onset relaxed (GOR), and straining-rapid onset conditions.
    • Incorporated factors include anti-G suits, PBG, reflexes, AGSM (up to 125 mm Hg, augmentable to 185 mm Hg with PBG), leg elevation, and seatback angles.
    • Straining GOR tolerance was determined to be a measure of G-duration, not G-level tolerance.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed mathematical models provide a validated framework for predicting human G-level tolerances.
    • The models effectively integrate multiple physiological countermeasures.
    • These predictions are vital for enhancing safety protocols in high-G environments.