Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Characterization of human crossover interference.

K W Broman1, J L Weber

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. kbroman@jhsph.edu

American Journal of Human Genetics
|May 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent advances in bifunctional synthesis gas conversion to chemicals and fuels with a comparison to monofunctional processes.

Catalysis science & technology·2024
Same author

Influence of Promotion on the Growth of Anchored Colloidal Iron Oxide Nanoparticles during Synthesis Gas Conversion.

ACS catalysis·2020
Same author

Diet, weight, cytokines and bone health in postmenopausal women.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2014
Same author

Survey of plant short tandem DNA repeats.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Six novel mutations in the myophosphorylase gene in patients with McArdle disease and a family with pseudo-dominant inheritance pattern.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2011
Same author

Quantitative lymphatic vessel trait analysis suggests Vcam1 as candidate modifier gene of inflammatory bowel disease.

Genes and immunity·2010
Same journal

Bi-allelic missense variants in human GPN2 result in Perrault syndrome.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Integrative analysis of gastric tissue transcriptomes and gastric cancer GWAS implicates candidate susceptibility genes.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

A transparent and generalizable deep-learning framework for genomic ancestry prediction.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Data-driven RNA phenotyping captures genetically regulated dimensions of the transcriptome.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Linkage disequilibrium and allelic heterogeneity explain variation in coronary artery disease risk at 9p21 across populations and reduced effect in Africans.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Genome-wide association study and predictors of neonatal blood cell traits in Hispanic newborns.

American journal of human genetics·2026
See all related articles

Strong crossover interference across the human genome was confirmed using genotype data. The gamma model best explained this interference, which occurs uninterrupted across centromeres.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Genomics
  • Human Genetics

Background:

  • Crossover interference is a phenomenon in genetics where one crossover event influences the likelihood of another nearby.
  • Understanding crossover interference is crucial for accurate genetic mapping and understanding genome structure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze crossover interference across the entire human genome.
  • To evaluate and compare five mathematical models of interference.
  • To investigate factors influencing interference, such as centromeres, sex, and chromosomes.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of genotype data from over 8,000 polymorphisms in eight CEPH families.
  • Evaluation of five mathematical models: the gamma model and four count-location models.
  • Comparison of intercrossover distance analysis versus crossover count analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Strong positive crossover interference was detected across the human genome.
  • The gamma model provided a significantly better fit to the data than other models.
  • Interference was observed to be continuous across centromeres, contrary to previous suggestions.
  • No significant differences in interference levels were found between sexes or among chromosomes, but individual variation was noted.

Conclusions:

  • Crossover interference is a robust feature of the human genome, best modeled by the gamma model.
  • Intercrossover distance analysis is superior for studying interference.
  • Interference spans centromeres and shows minimal variation across sexes and chromosomes, with potential for individual differences.