Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization.

L E Crawford1, T Regier, J Huttenlocher

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 5848 S. University Avenue, Chicago 60615, USA. crawford@ccp.uchicago.edu

Cognition
|May 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enriched environment exposure accelerates rodent driving skills.

Behavioural brain research·2019
Same author

Common variant at 16p11.2 conferring risk of psychosis.

Molecular psychiatry·2012
Same author

Probing the role of co substitution in the electronic structure of iron pnictides.

Physical review letters·2012
Same author

Ultrathin W-Al dual interlayer approach to depositing smooth and adherent nanocrystalline diamond films on stainless steel.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2010
Same author

Comparative theoretical and experimental study of the radiation-induced decomposition of glycine.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2009
Same author

Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2008
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals an inverse relationship between how we describe spatial relations linguistically and how we perceive them non-linguistically. Spatial language prototypes act as boundaries in non-linguistic perception.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Previous research suggested linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization align.
  • The relationship between spatial language and spatial representation remains an active area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correspondence between linguistic and non-linguistic categorization of spatial relations.
  • To challenge existing literature claiming a direct correspondence between spatial language and perception.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted comparing linguistic and non-linguistic responses to identical spatial stimuli.
  • Methods included linguistic acceptability judgments and analysis of bias in spatial reproduction tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Findings indicate a lack of correspondence between linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categories.
  • An inverse relationship was observed: linguistic category prototypes (e.g., 'above') function as boundaries in non-linguistic categorization.
  • Evidence from acceptability judgments and reproduction biases supports this inverse relation.

Conclusions:

  • Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial organization share an underlying structure.
  • This common structure plays distinct roles in linguistic and non-linguistic spatial systems.
  • The study reframes the understanding of how language influences spatial cognition.