Related Experiment Videos
Clinical performance of polyacid-modified resin restorations using "softstart-polymerization"
H Oberländer1, K H Friedl, G Schmalz
1University of Regensburg, Dental School, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Germany. heinrich.oberlaender@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
Clinical Oral Investigations
|May 10, 2000
Summary
Soft-start polymerization did not significantly impact the clinical performance of polyacid-modified resin restorations (PMR). However, cavity preparation influenced marginal adaptation differences between enamel and dentin.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Restorative Dentistry
- Polymer Chemistry
Background:
- Polyacid-modified resin restorations (PMR) are used for class V cavities.
- Soft-start polymerization (SSP) is a light-curing technique potentially improving restoration quality.
- Clinical performance and marginal integrity of PMR with SSP require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical performance and marginal integrity of two PMR materials (Dyract and Hytac) using conventional polymerization (CP) versus soft-start polymerization (SSP).
- To assess the influence of cavity preparation on the marginal quality of PMR restorations.
Main Methods:
- Eighty PMR restorations (40 Dyract, 40 Hytac) were placed in class V cavities in 20 patients, with or without cavity preparation.
- Restorations were light-cured using either conventional (CP) or soft-start polymerization (SSP).
- Clinical examinations (modified USPHS criteria) and SEM analysis were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in clinical performance or marginal integrity were found between CP and SSP modes for either material.
- After 1 year, marginal integrity rated "Bravo" ranged from 24-47% for Hytac and 36-53% for Dyract.
- Without cavity preparation, marginal adaptation to dentin was significantly worse than to enamel for both materials with SSP, and for Hytac with CP.
Conclusions:
- Soft-start polymerization does not offer significant clinical advantages over conventional polymerization for these PMR materials in class V cavities.
- Cavity preparation appears to influence the marginal adaptation differences between enamel and dentin interfaces.
- Further research may explore material-specific responses to polymerization techniques and cavity preparation designs.