Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Center-weighting issues in multicenter clinical trials.

P P Gallo1

  • 1Biostatistics Department, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936-1080, USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|May 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Poisson regression analysis in clinical research.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·1995
Same author

Effect of age on serum chemistry profile, electrophoresis and thyroid hormones in beagle dogs two weeks to one year of age.

Veterinary clinical pathology·1988
Same author

Age-related changes in serum chemistry and hematology values in normal Sprague-Dawley rats.

Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology·1987
Same author

Reference range data base for serum chemistry and hematology values in laboratory animals.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health·1986
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

For multicenter clinical trials, this study compares weighting methods for linear models. Equal weighting can lead to incorrect sample size calculations when center sizes vary, impacting analysis efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Multicenter clinical trials involve data from multiple research sites.
  • Analyzing data from these trials requires careful consideration of how to weight results from individual centers.
  • Common approaches include equal weighting or weighting by information content.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare commonly used weighting approaches in linear model analysis for multicenter trials.
  • To define a measure of center size imbalance and its relation to weighting efficiency.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of conventional sample size calculations under different weighting schemes.

Main Methods:

  • Linear model analysis applied to simulated or real multicenter trial data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Definition and application of a novel measure for center size imbalance.
  • Comparison of statistical efficiencies between equal and information-weighted approaches.
  • Discussion of center weighting in the context of random-effect models.

    • Main Results:

    • A measure of center size imbalance is defined, quantifying the relative efficiencies of equal versus information-weighted approaches.
    • Conventional sample size calculation methods are shown to be inaccurate when centers of varying sizes are equally weighted.
    • The impact of center size imbalance on statistical power and precision is demonstrated.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of weighting method significantly impacts the analysis of multicenter clinical trial data.
    • Equal weighting can lead to suboptimal or incorrect sample size determinations when center sizes differ.
    • Accurate sample size calculations and efficient data analysis require accounting for center size variations and appropriate weighting strategies.