Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Monitoring Functionality and Morphology of Vasculature Recruited by Factors Secreted by Fast-growing Tumor-generating Cells
Published on: November 23, 2014
Clinical strategy for the development of angiogenesis inhibitors
1SUGEN, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA. star-wescott@sugen.com
Abstract:
Angiogenesis inhibitors differ from conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy agents by targeting normal cells rather than tumor cells, which may contain multiple mutations. Because of this, the traditional strategy used in clinical development of cytotoxic agents may not be appropriate for these novel agents. Many clinical studies are now evaluating these agents with a new approach, referred to as the cytostatic paradigm. The cornerstone of the cytostatic paradigm is the use of time to progression (TTP) of disease as the decision-making criterion for "go/no go" in the early phases of clinical development. However, the use of TTP as the main criterion for clinical trials is complicated for a variety of reasons, including: A) the lack of standardized criteria accepted by regulatory authorities; B) the heterogeneity of the historical database, and C) the larger number of patients needed for the "go/no go" decision-making process. In addition, clinical trials of cytotoxic agents have traditionally used objective response (despite the controversy regarding objective response as a surrogate for clinical activity) as the main criterion for determining whether the results of phase II studies justify the pivotal phase III studies. Another aspect of the clinical development strategy is combining angiogenesis inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The rationale for combination of angiogenesis inhibitors with cytotoxic agents is based on: A) different targets for these agents; B) lack of cross-resistance patterns; C) lack of myelosuppression with angiogenesis inhibitors allows administration of full doses of all agents, and D) the assumption that combining these agents will result in additive antitumor activity. Combination therapy with angiogenesis inhibitors may be attractive to both clinicians and their patients because it allows cytostatic agents to be used upfront in treatment while contributing to drug registration strategy (cytostatic/cytotoxic combination therapy versus cytotoxic therapy). The clinical development of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416, a small molecule inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor, is currently ongoing. In phase I trials, SU5416 demonstrated activity in both colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Based on these encouraging results, phase III studies to evaluate combination of SU5416 with established cytotoxic therapy are planned. These studies will include an interim analysis, the equivalent of a phase II evaluation of clinical activity. If successful, this strategic approach will save significant time in the clinical development process.
Insights
Angiogenesis inhibitors, targeting normal cells, require new clinical trial strategies like the cytostatic paradigm. Combining these with chemotherapy may accelerate drug development, as seen with SU5416 trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Drug Development
Background:
- Angiogenesis inhibitors target normal cells, unlike cytotoxic agents targeting mutated tumor cells, necessitating different clinical development strategies.
- The traditional cytotoxic agent development paradigm may not be suitable for novel angiogenesis inhibitors.
- The cytostatic paradigm, using time to progression (TTP), is being explored for these agents.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss the challenges and strategies in the clinical development of angiogenesis inhibitors.
- To evaluate the cytostatic paradigm and combination therapy approaches.
- To highlight the ongoing development of SU5416, a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical trial strategies for cytotoxic agents versus angiogenesis inhibitors.
- Discussion of the cytostatic paradigm and its reliance on time to progression (TTP).
- Examination of the rationale and potential benefits of combining angiogenesis inhibitors with cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Main Results:
- Time to progression (TTP) presents challenges as a primary endpoint due to lack of standardization, database heterogeneity, and large patient requirements.
- Combination therapy with angiogenesis inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy offers potential for additive antitumor activity and streamlined drug registration.
- Phase I trials of SU5416 showed activity in colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer, prompting planned Phase III combination studies.
Conclusions:
- The development of angiogenesis inhibitors requires adapting traditional clinical trial methodologies.
- The cytostatic paradigm and combination therapies represent promising strategies for advancing these novel agents.
- The strategic development of SU5416, including combination therapy and interim analyses, aims to expedite the clinical development process.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Mechanism of Angiogenesis
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply

