Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neutron carcinogenesis: past, present, and future.

C K Hill1, D Williams-Hill

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, USC School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90089, USA. ckhill@hsc.usc.edu

Journal of Radiation Research
|May 11, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Neutrons are potent cancer-causing agents, more effective than conventional radiation. Understanding their varying energies, dose rates, and biological effects is crucial for assessing risks in medicine and industry.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mutation induction and RBE of low energy neutrons in V79 cells.

Journal of radiation research·2000
Same author

Radiobiological studies using synchrotron-produced ultrasoft X-rays.

Journal of radiation research·2000
Same author

Mutagenicity studies of methyl-tert-butylether using the Ames tester strain TA102.

Mutation research·1999
Same author

Synchroton-produced ultrasoft X rays: equivalent cell survival at the isoattenuating energies 273 eV and 860 eV.

Radiation research·1998
Same author

A comparison of cytotoxicity after whole- or partial-cell irradiation with synchrotron-produced ultrasoft X rays.

Radiation research·1998
Same author

Phase transitions in the growth of C3H 10T1/2 cells.

Radiation research·1998

Area of Science:

  • Radiation biology
  • Radiobiology
  • Radiation oncology

Background:

  • Interest in neutron carcinogenicity emerged post-discovery, driven by early applications and nuclear events.
  • High Linear Energy Transfer (LET) radiation, including neutrons, poses distinct biological risks compared to conventional radiation.
  • Neutrons are recognized as highly effective cell-killing agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey differences in neutron energies and sources compared to conventional radiation.
  • To analyze the influence of dose rate, DNA repair, and cell cycle distribution on neutron-induced carcinogenesis.
  • To explore molecular mechanisms underlying neutron effects and address knowledge gaps in risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of carcinogenicity and mutation studies involving various neutron energies and sources.
  • Comparative analysis of neutron radiation effects versus conventional ionizing radiation.
  • Discussion of experimental data from laboratory studies and existing literature.

Main Results:

  • Neutrons exhibit high cell-killing efficacy, varying with energy and source.
  • Dose rate, DNA repair efficiency, and cell cycle distribution significantly modulate carcinogenic outcomes.
  • Existing studies highlight the complex biological impact of neutrons.

Conclusions:

  • Significant questions remain regarding the precise biological risks of neutrons, especially at low doses.
  • Further molecular research is needed to understand DNA repair fidelity and potential for delayed genetic instability.
  • Accurate risk assessment is vital due to increasing neutron applications in medicine, military, and industry.

Related Experiment Videos