Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selecting foils for identification lineups: matching suspects or descriptions?

J L Tunnicliff1, S E Clark

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, USA.

Law and Human Behavior
|May 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Comparing lineup construction methods, this study found that neither suspect-matched nor description-matched techniques significantly improved identification accuracy. However, suspect-matched lineups may reduce mistaken rejections and encourage more "no-pick" responses.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The investigation and management of unilateral nipple discharge.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2020
Same author

Neutral Hydrogen Structures Trace Dust Polarization Angle: Implications for Cosmic Microwave Background Foregrounds.

Physical review letters·2015
Same author

Enhanced collisionless shock formation in a magnetized plasma containing a density gradient.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2014
Same author

Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2014
Same author

A Contralateral Complication of Extra-peritoneal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Journal of surgical case reports·2014
Same author

Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Eyewitness Identification Procedures

Background:

  • Effective eyewitness identification is crucial for the justice system.
  • Lineup construction methods, specifically suspect-matched and description-matched, are debated for their efficacy.
  • Previous research suggests description-matched lineups may offer advantages in accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare the effectiveness of suspect-matched and description-matched foil selection methods in identification lineups.
  • To evaluate whether lineup construction impacts correct identification rates and false identification of innocent suspects.
  • To investigate the influence of lineup methods on participant responses like 'no-pick' and rejections.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted, with lineups created by police officers (Experiment 1) and college students (Experiment 2).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants evaluated identification lineups constructed using either the suspect-matched or description-matched foil selection method.
  • Key metrics included correct identification rates, false identification rates, suspect-to-foil similarity, and response types (e.g., no-pick, rejection).
  • Main Results:

    • Both experiments confirmed higher suspect-to-foil similarity in suspect-matched lineups compared to description-matched lineups.
    • No significant differences were observed between the two methods regarding correct identification rates or false identification rates.
    • Suspect-matched lineups showed a potential advantage in eliciting 'no-pick' and rejection responses.

    Conclusions:

    • The study's findings do not conclusively support the superiority of either description-matched or suspect-matched lineup construction methods based on identification accuracy.
    • The observed higher suspect-to-foil similarity in suspect-matched lineups did not translate to differences in identification accuracy.
    • Further research is needed before definitively endorsing one lineup construction method over the other, considering potential impacts on response patterns.