Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence for split attentional foci.

E Awh1, H Pashler

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene 97403-1227, USA. awh@darkwing.uoregon.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|May 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Divided attention: Storing and classifying briefly presented objects.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Verbal Working Memory Load Affects Regional Brain Activation as Measured by PET.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Interactions between attention and working memory.

Neuroscience·2005
Same author

The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Brain research. Cognitive brain research·2004
Same author

Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Observers can split attention between noncontiguous locations, but accuracy is higher at cued locations than intervening ones. This spatial attention ability is enhanced when targets appear in different visual hemifields.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual attention

Background:

  • Spatial attention allows focusing on specific locations.
  • Understanding how attention is deployed across noncontiguous areas is crucial.
  • Previous research explored attention allocation but less on noncontiguous splits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the ability to split attention between noncontiguous locations.
  • To examine the influence of cue orientation on attention splitting.
  • To determine the mechanisms underlying flexible spatial attention deployment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a partial report procedure with a 5x5 stimulus array.
  • Employed 80% valid cues to indicate likely target locations.
  • Manipulated cue orientation (horizontal vs. vertical) and target positions (cued vs. intervening).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a significant accuracy advantage for targets at cued locations over intervening ones.
  • Observed a larger accuracy benefit for horizontally oriented cues compared to vertically oriented ones.
  • Found evidence that cue orientation effects relate to processing targets in different hemifields.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial attention can be split across noncontiguous locations, with a bias towards cued areas.
  • Attentional benefits are influenced by cue orientation, potentially due to hemifield processing.
  • Suppression of interference from unattended locations is a key mechanism for flexible spatial attention.