A model for harmonization of routine clinical chemistry results between clinical laboratories

Clinical chemistry laboratory results from different laboratories often show large between-laboratory variation due to factors such as differences in method principles, method applications, calibration procedures or the application of different instrument factor settings within the same calibration procedure. We have examined the possible use of common calibrators to reduce this variation. Three different calibrators were compared: A, freeze-dried preparations of pooled patients' serum samples, spiked to give three concentration levels; B, freeze-dried preparations of pooled patients' serum samples selected on the basis of elevated enzyme activities at three levels; C, a single calibrator consisting of frozen pooled serum samples. These calibrators were sent to 11 participating laboratories together with 14 fresh patients' serum samples. We report the variation of the results of 21 general clinical chemistry analytes obtained in the patients' serum samples before and after recalculation on the basis of the results of the calibrators. For most analytes the use of a multiple point linear regression calibration function is able to reduce the between-laboratory variation considerably from more than 30% (enzymes) to values well within the bias limits set by European quality specifications, when the necessary conditions are met. These conditions include the commutability of the calibrator(s) with fresh patients' material. For the enzymes, calibrator material originating from selectively pooled patients' samples appeared to be necessary, whereas for the substrates selectively pooled serum calibrators spiked with exogenous supplements may be used. For harmonization to be effective in practice, calibrators need to be stable over time and to carry assigned values set by certified reference laboratories, and the quality performance of participating laboratories should be appropriately monitored.