Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sex, sex differences, and social behavior.

V C Rabinowitz1, V Valian

  • 1Department of Psychology, Hunter College of CUNY 10021, USA.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
|May 20, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Evolutionary psychology and social psychology offer different views on sex differences. This paper critiques evolutionary psychology

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rethinking learning: comments on Rethinking innateness.

Journal of child language·1999
Same author

The development of syntactic subjects in Portuguese-speaking children.

Journal of child language·1996
Same author

Sex and gender bias in animal research and in clinical studies of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and depression.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1994
Same author

Memory. When less is more.

The American psychologist·1994
Same author

Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children.

Cognition·1991
Same author

Null subjects: a problem for parameter-setting models of language acquisition.

Cognition·1990

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Sex differences in social behavior are a key focus in evolutionary psychology.
  • Evolutionary psychology posits long-term adaptations influence behavior, contrasting with social psychology's emphasis on social structures.
  • Current theories often fail to integrate these perspectives effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the current formulations of evolutionary psychology regarding social behavior.
  • To highlight limitations in evolutionary psychology, including the lack of mediating variables and rigorous prediction testing.
  • To advocate for a more integrated, interactionist approach between evolutionary and social psychology.

Main Methods:

  • Critical analysis of existing theories and empirical evidence.
  • Examination of key concepts such as mediating variables, first- and second-order effects, and interactionist frameworks.
  • Review of social implications, particularly regarding sex-based inequities.

Main Results:

  • Evolutionary psychology's current models are criticized for not adequately incorporating mediating variables or testing predictions rigorously.
  • A gap exists in appreciating the nuances of evolutionary hypotheses and their potential role in interactionist theories.
  • Social psychology has not fully embraced the potential contributions of evolutionary psychology.

Conclusions:

  • A more interactionist theory is needed to fully understand social and cognitive sex differences.
  • Integrating insights from both evolutionary and social psychology is crucial for a comprehensive perspective.
  • This paper calls for a renewed effort to bridge these theoretical divides.

Related Experiment Videos