Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
Published on: December 15, 2010
A code-theoretical note on object handedness
E Leeuwenberg1, P van der Helm
1Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information (NICI), University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
This study is a theoretical exercise dealing with discrimination between images and mirror-images. It focuses on the way codes of shapes represent their handedness. We compare two code systems with different reference frames. These frames determine the specific sensitivity of each system. One system uses an asymmetric reference frame. It is called the H-system and was inspired by an idea of Corballis (1988 Psychological Review 95 115-123). The other system, being our proposal, uses a symmetric reference frame and we have named it the M-system. We demonstrate the following. A code of the H-system provides a cue for the handedness of a shape, but not for rotation, i.e. no cue for the appropriate kind of code rotation which should be tested in case images and mirror-images are discerned by mental rotation. The M-system is the converse in both respects. A code of this system does not provide a handedness cue but, instead, a rotation cue. Thus, for handedness discrimination, the H-system neither needs nor guides mental rotation, whereas the M-system does both. This M-system generates object-centred structural codes enriched with viewpoint information. Various visual experiments reported in the literature favour the M-system over the H-system, implying that perception does not make use of an asymmetric but of a symmetric reference frame.
More Related Videos
08:01Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
07:06Block Building Task Identifies Distinct Groups of Left/Right-hand Choice Patterns After Unilateral Peripheral Nerve Injury
Published on: March 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Principle of Equivalence
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Lateralization
Concepts and Prototypes
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...