[Comparison of various methods in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection]

There are several possible methods to detect H. pylori in the gastric mucosa. The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of these tests and to define their place in the clinical practice. 109 (45 male, 64 female) patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy were included. Before endoscopy, whole blood was collected for serological test and 13C-UBT (13C-urea breath test) was performed. During endoscopy, multiple biopsies were collected from the antrum and corpus for the examination of H. pylori status by histology and rapid urease test. Patients with positive histology and a positive result of any other examinations, or--in case of negative histology--with two positive results of the remaining examinations were considered to be H. pylori-positive. 50 patients (46%) proved to be H. pylori-positive. Sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were as follows [in brackets: negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV), respectively]: histology, 98% and 92% (98% and 91%); 13C-UBT, 93% and 98% (94% and 98%); rapid urease test, 83% and 100% (86% and 100%); serological examination, 86% and 74% (88% and 70%). The sensitivity and the clinical role of the methods used for the detection of H, pylori infection is different. Histology is the most reliable method if endoscopy in performed. The positive result of the rapid urease test is also of good diagnostic value. The 13C-UBT is the method of choice if no endoscopy is performed and the clarification of H. pylori status is necessary. This method can be useful to control the success of bacterium eradication as well. The serological examination provides instant result, therefore this method is proposed for screening and epidemiological studies.