Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Direction biasing by brief apparent motion stimuli.

A J Pantle1, D P Gallogly, O C Piehler

  • 1Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. pantleaj@muohio.edu

Vision Research
|June 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational analyses in cognitive neuroscience: in defense of biological implausibility.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Direction-specific changes of sensitivity after brief apparent motion stimuli.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Visual inertia of rotating 3-D objects.

Perception & psychophysics·1998
Same author

Temporal determinants of spatial sine-wave masking.

Vision research·1983
Same author

Apparent movement of successively generated subjective figures.

Perception·1978
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Effects of color-enhancing filters on color salience in normal trichromats.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Motion perception direction can be altered by prior motion stimuli. Specific stimulus conditions determine whether this influence enhances (positive filter biasing) or reduces (negative filter biasing) perceived motion direction.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Motion Perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The perceived direction of motion can be modulated by preceding motion stimuli.
  • This influence, termed 'biasing', can either enhance or suppress the perceived direction of a subsequent motion step (probe stimulus).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the conditions under which preceding motion stimuli (biasing stimulus) influence the perceived direction of a subsequent motion step (probe stimulus).
  • To differentiate between positive filter biasing (enhancement) and negative filter biasing (suppression) of motion direction perception.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments involved presenting a biasing stimulus (motion step or sweep) followed by a probe stimulus.
  • Varying parameters such as the number of steps, phase angle traversed, and duration of the biasing stimulus.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the perceived direction of the probe stimulus in relation to the biasing stimulus.

    • Main Results:

    • Short, rapid biasing motions (fewer than six steps, <100 ms, 90 degrees) induced positive filter biasing.
    • Longer or more complex biasing motions (more than six steps, 90 degrees or 270 degrees) induced negative filter biasing.
    • Negative filter biasing was more pervasive and suggested a direction-specific adaptation or gain-control mechanism in motion filters.

    Conclusions:

    • The direction of perceived motion is dynamically influenced by prior motion exposure.
    • The nature of this influence (enhancement vs. suppression) depends critically on the spatiotemporal characteristics of the preceding stimulus.
    • Findings support models of motion perception involving adaptation-like processes within neural filters.