Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to read a systematic review.

D L Hunt1, R B Haynes

  • 1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. huntdl@fhs.csu.mcmaster.ca

Indian Journal of Pediatrics
|June 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does conventional early life academic excellence predict later life scientific discovery? An assessment of the lives of great medical innovators.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2020
Same author

Increasing adherence to treatment in epilepsy: what do the strongest trials show?

Acta neurologica Scandinavica·2016
Same author

Efficiency of pragmatic search strategies to update clinical guidelines recommendations.

BMC medical research methodology·2015
Same author

Impact of rosiglitazone on body composition, hepatic fat, fatty acids, adipokines and glucose in persons with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance: a sub-study of the DREAM trial.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2014
Same author

The clinical relevance and newsworthiness of NIHR HTA-funded research: a cohort study.

BMJ open·2014
Same author

Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2012
Same journal

A Prospective Model for Detecting Missed Appendicitis in Low-Risk Pediatric Patients: Correspondence.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Serum Periostin as a Biomarker in Pediatric Asthma: Findings from a Case-Control Study - Authors' Reply.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same journal

When the Eye Peels: An Unusual Harbinger of Kawasaki Disease - Correspondence.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Pediatric Sleep-Related Laryngospasm: Cause of Nocturnal Respiratory Distress.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Validation of DSD Interpreter, a Mobile Application for Point-of-Care Evaluation of Infants with Atypical Genitalia: Correspondence.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
Same journal

Prenatal Diagnosis and Genomics in India - Historical Review, Current Status and Road Ahead.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2026
See all related articles

Systematic reviews are rigorous studies answering focused clinical questions using prespecified methods. Readers should evaluate eight key aspects to ensure review quality and applicability to patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Distinguishes systematic reviews from narrative reviews.
  • Highlights the need for structured methodology in reviews.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the characteristics of a systematic review.
  • To provide readers with critical appraisal questions for evaluating systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • Defines systematic review as a planned study.
  • Emphasizes the use of prespecified methodology.
  • Outlines eight critical questions for assessing systematic reviews.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews are distinct from narrative reviews due to their rigorous methodology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eight key questions guide the critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

    • Conclusions:

    • Systematic reviews offer a high level of evidence when conducted properly.
    • Readers can effectively assess the quality and applicability of systematic reviews by asking specific questions.