Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome.

D A Petrov1, D L Hartl

  • 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

The Journal of Heredity
|June 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pervasive Fitness Trade-Offs Revealed by Rapid Adaptation to Shifting Population Densities in Large Experimental Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

High-resolution mapping of a rapidly evolving complex trait reveals genotype-phenotype stability and an unpredictable genetic architecture of adaptation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Pervasive fitness trade-offs revealed by rapid adaptation to shifting population densities in large experimental populations of <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

Continuously fluctuating selection reveals fine granularity of adaptation.

Nature·2024
Same author

Continuously fluctuating selection reveals extreme granularity and parallelism of adaptive tracking.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same author

Characterization of the iron oxide phases formed during the synthesis of core-shell Fe<sub>x</sub>O<sub>y</sub>@C nanoparticles modified with Ag.

Nanotechnology·2020
Same journal

Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the rice stink bug (Hemiptera: Oebalus pugnax) illuminates genome structure and gene family evolution in Pentatomidae.

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same journal

Rapid Derivation of Cloning-Competent Cells from Peripheral Blood Advances Conservation Biobanking.

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same journal

Genomic vulnerability to climate change of a poorly dispersing and threatened fish, the southern pygmy perch (Nannoperca australis).

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same journal

The complete genomes of two hybridizing field crickets, Gryllus pennsylvanicus and Gryllus firmus.

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same journal

Chromosome-level genome assembly and annotation of the transverse lady beetle Coccinella transversoguttata.

The Journal of heredity·2026
Same journal

A Chromosome-Level Assembly of the Pine Processionary Moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa) genome.

The Journal of heredity·2026
See all related articles

Pseudogenes, nonfunctional gene copies, offer insights into mutation patterns. Selection for genome size may influence pseudogene deletions, but evidence suggests this effect is minimal in Drosophila.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary genetics
  • Genomics
  • Molecular evolution

Background:

  • Pseudogenes are nonfunctional gene copies thought to evolve without selective constraints.
  • Their utility in evolutionary genetics lies in estimating spontaneous mutation patterns.
  • However, pseudogenes might affect fitness through non-sequence-related mechanisms, such as genome size.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the implications of selection for genome size on pseudogene deletions.
  • To compare deletion spectra in Drosophila and mammalian pseudogenes.
  • To assess if selection for genome size can explain observed differences in deletion patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of empirical evidence on deletion size distribution in pseudogenes.
  • Examination of theoretical implications of selection for genome size.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of deletion spectra between Drosophila and mammalian pseudogenes.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant difference exists in the deletion spectra of Drosophila and mammalian pseudogenes.
    • Selection for genome size, if acting on small deletions, is unlikely to be the primary driver of these differences.
    • The magnitude of selection for genome size may not be sufficient to significantly impact small deletion fixation in Drosophila.

    Conclusions:

    • Observed differences in pseudogene deletion spectra between organisms are not easily explained by selection for genome size.
    • Alternative evolutionary mechanisms likely contribute to pseudogene evolution.
    • Further research is needed to fully understand the evolutionary dynamics of pseudogenes and genome size.