Tightness of duraplasty in rabbits: a comparative study

The purpose of this study was to test, in rabbits, the tightness of seven dural substitution materials commonly used in neurosurgery, i.e., Lyodura (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany), Tutoplast dura (Tutogen Medical, Inc., Parsippany, NJ), Tutoplast fascia lata (Tutogen Medical, Inc.), autologous periosteum, Neuropatch (B. Braun Melsungen AG), Dacron (E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE), and Ethisorb (Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ).

Duraplasties were performed with sutures alone or were additionally fixed with fibrin glue. Leakage pressures were assessed by infusion of artificial cerebrospinal fluid, containing sodium fluorescein, into the cisterna magna and detection of fluorescence using a charge-coupled display camera with background substraction, 3 days, 3 weeks, or 3 months after surgery.

Three days after implantation, the mean tightness values of duraplasties with Lyodura or Neuropatch were significantly higher (P = 0.007) than the values for the other substitutes. A significant improvement of tightness with increasing implantation time could be demonstrated for autologous periosteum (P = 0.0063). Improvement of tightness with the use of fibrin glue could be proven only for the heterologous grafts (P = 0.0071). The tightness values for Neuropatch fixed only with sutures were similar to those for the best heterologous substitutes implanted with additional fibrin glue. Lyodura, Tutoplast dura, and Neuropatch demonstrated favorable implantation characteristics; they were thin, flexible, and easily suturable. Neither adhesions to the brain nor space-occupying scars were noted.

These results confirm the excellent suitability of Lyodura and Neuropatch for dural substitution.