Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions.

S P Wise1, E A Murray

  • 1Laboratory of Systems Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.

Trends in Neurosciences
|June 6, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aspiration removal of orbitofrontal cortex disrupts cholinergic fibers of passage to anterior cingulate cortex in rhesus macaques.

Brain structure & function·2024
Same author

Bacterial community structure and response to nitrogen amendments in Lake Shenandoah (VA, USA).

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2019
Same author

Lanatoside C (cedilanid).

The New Orleans medical and surgical journal·2010
Same author

Some correctible anomalies of the heart and great vessels.

The New Orleans medical and surgical journal·2010
Same author

Alterations of white matter tracts following neurotoxic hippocampal lesions in macaque monkeys: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

Hippocampus·2010
Same author

Neural substrates of intermanual transfer of a newly acquired motor skill.

Current biology : CB·2007

This review examines how mammals learn to link specific sensory cues to unrelated actions, a flexible cognitive skill known as arbitrary visuomotor mapping. The authors synthesize recent findings on the brain networks involved, including the frontal cortex, hippocampus, and basal ganglia, which adapt their activity as this learning occurs.

Area of Science:

  • Arbitrary visuomotor mapping research within cognitive neuroscience
  • Behavioral psychology and systems neuroscience

Background:

No consensus exists regarding how mammals link sensory cues to unrelated motor outputs. Prior research has shown that this flexible behavior relies on conditional discrimination. That uncertainty drove interest in the underlying neural circuitry. It was already known that spatial cues often guide movement naturally. This gap motivated investigations into non-spatial associations. Prior work had resolved that specific brain regions participate in these tasks. However, the exact evolution of neuronal activity remained unclear. This review synthesizes current evidence to clarify these complex cognitive processes.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to synthesize current knowledge regarding arbitrary visuomotor mapping in mammals. This study addresses the mechanisms by which sensory cues are linked to unrelated motor actions. The authors seek to clarify how flexible behavior is supported by specific neural structures. This gap motivated a detailed examination of the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. That uncertainty drove the need to consolidate findings on hippocampal involvement. No prior work had resolved how these regions coordinate during the learning process. The review provides a framework for understanding the evolution of neuronal activity. This work clarifies the cognitive capabilities that allow for such diverse behavioral repertoires.

Keywords:
conditional motor learningbehavioral flexibilitycognitive neurosciencemotor control

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that this behavior relies on a distributed network including the frontal cortex, hippocampal system, and basal ganglia. These regions exhibit systematic changes in neuronal activity as subjects acquire new associations between sensory cues and motor responses.

The authors describe this process as conditional motor learning or conditional discrimination. These terms highlight the flexible nature of mapping sensory inputs to specific goals without relying on inherent spatial relationships.

The authors note that these associations are unique because the sensory cue location lacks a systematic spatial relationship with the intended goal. This distinguishes the process from standard visuomotor guidance where spatial proximity often dictates movement.

The review synthesizes data from studies tracking neuronal activity evolution. These investigations demonstrate that neurons within the identified brain regions undergo systematic changes during the acquisition of new behavioral rules.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach synthesizes evidence from recent neuroscientific literature. Authors examined studies focusing on flexible behavioral repertoires in mammals. Investigators prioritized research identifying brain regions active during conditional discrimination tasks. The analysis utilized data from electrophysiological and neuroimaging experiments. Researchers evaluated how specific cortical and subcortical areas contribute to motor learning. The synthesis focused on identifying commonalities across diverse experimental paradigms. This approach allowed for a comprehensive overview of the underlying circuitry. The authors systematically categorized findings related to neuronal activity changes during task acquisition.

Main Results:

Key findings from the literature confirm that arbitrary visuomotor mapping engages a specialized neural network. The frontal cortex, hippocampal system, and basal ganglia serve as the core components of this system. Neurons within these areas demonstrate systematic evolution in their firing patterns during learning. This activity shift enables the flexible linkage of sensory cues to motor goals. The literature indicates that these associations occur despite the absence of spatial relationships. Evidence shows that these regions function in concert to support behavioral flexibility. Studies consistently report that learning involves dynamic changes in neuronal responses across these structures. The synthesis highlights the integration of these distinct brain areas in facilitating complex motor behavior.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that arbitrary visuomotor mapping requires coordinated activity across multiple brain systems. Frontal cortex involvement suggests high-level control over motor selection. Hippocampal contributions indicate a role for memory in linking cues to goals. Basal ganglia activity likely facilitates the refinement of these learned associations. The synthesis implies that learning involves systematic changes in neuronal firing patterns. These findings suggest that flexibility stems from distributed network plasticity. Future inquiries might focus on how these regions interact during task acquisition. The review confirms that this behavior represents a highly adaptable mammalian capability.

The researchers identify the frontal cortex, hippocampal system, and basal ganglia as the primary components. Each structure contributes to the flexible mapping of cues to actions during behavioral tasks.

The authors imply that the flexibility of mammalian behavior is rooted in the plasticity of these neural networks. This allows organisms to adapt to changing environments by forming novel associations between cues and actions.