Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Early experience with clinical indicators in surgery.

B T Collopy1, L Rodgers, P Woodruff

  • 1Australian Council on Healthcare Standards Care Evaluation Program, Aikenhead Centre, St Vincent's Hopsital, Fitzroy, Victoria. bcollopy@skynet.net.au

The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery
|June 8, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adverse events in the 'medical' ward.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same author

Ensuring accuracy of clinical data is only part of the audit process.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same author

Colorectal anastomotic leak rates are measures of technical skill in surgery.

ANZ journal of surgery·2001
Same author

Adverse events in British hospitals. Threshold used for determining adverse events is important.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2001
Same author

Clinical indicators in accreditation: an effective stimulus to improve patient care.

International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care·2000
Same author

The ACHS Care Evaluation Program: a decade of achievement. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2000

The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) clinical indicators, introduced in 1997, provide valuable data on surgical care quality. Refinements led to a reduced set of 29 indicators by 1999, aiming to improve surgical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Surgical Outcomes Measurement
  • Clinical Performance Monitoring

Background:

  • Established in 1997, 53 clinical indicators from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) and Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) were integrated into the EQuIP program.
  • These indicators, covering 20 conditions/procedures across eight specialties, served as flags for potential issues in surgical care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the initial implementation and impact of a national set of clinical indicators for surgical care.
  • To assess the comparability of Australian surgical outcomes with international data and identify areas for improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Indicators were developed over several years, involving literature reviews, field testing, and revisions.
  • Data from 155 healthcare organizations in 1997, increasing to 210 in 1998, were collected from public and private facilities across all states.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Data for 1997-1998 showed comparable rates to international literature for some indicators (e.g., bile duct injury, graft surgery mortality).
  • Discrepancies in other indicators (e.g., negative appendectomy histology, skin tumor excision completeness) highlighted areas needing further investigation.
  • Data reliability and reproducibility were noted as crucial for accurate interpretation, with hospital-level validation being essential.

Conclusions:

  • A review process refined indicators, reducing the set to 29 by January 1999 for improved usability.
  • The clinical indicator program aims to stimulate the modification and improvement of surgical practice.
  • Clinician involvement is expected to enhance data reliability and program effectiveness.