Related Experiment Videos
[Prescription and costs of artificial nutrition before and after a new utilization protocol]
J L Villalobos1, F Tutau, R Mora
1Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, España. humfarmajlv@hvv.sas.cica.es
Abstract:
In order to improve the quality of prescription and reduce expenditure, the artificial nutrition department has designed a new usage protocol: justification sheet, table of indications for parenteral nutrition (PN), nutritional assessment, etc. The Pharmacy Department is in charge of the follow-up of this programme and maintaining the database derived from it. Comparing the data for the year before (1996) and after (1998) implementation of this programme, we can see that as a result 9 patients/day switched from total parenteral nutrition by central administration to hypocaloric peripheral nutrition, with the prevalence of the former dropping to 1.4% of admissions and 2% of stays. The share of enteral nutrition (30.6%) and hypocaloric peripheral nutrition (27.8%) increases in the overall expenditure on artificial nutrition, with a reduction in the total parenteral nutrition (41.6%). The costs of parenteral nutrition per admission and stay are reduced by 39.3% and 33.5%, respectively, to 1,625 and 183 pesetas. This represents a saving of 16.5 million pesetas. The expenditure on PN elements declines by two percentage points to 2.2% of pharmaceutical expenditure. As an additional benefit, it is possible to identify each of the clinical situations which give rise to this indication and to allocate costs by diagnosis and department. Together with the containment of expenditure, it has been possible to increase the participation of everyone in the rational use of clinical nutrition thus highlighting its interdisciplinary nature.