Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating WIC.

D J Besharov1, P Germanis

  • 1University of Maryland, USA.

Evaluation Review
|June 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Research on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) shows limited proven benefits, particularly for prenatal care. Further research and program reforms are needed to enhance WIC

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How we can better protect children from abuse and neglect.

The Future of children·1998
Same author

Trends in teen sexual behavior.

Children and youth services review·1997
Same author

Responding to child sexual abuse: the need for a balanced approach.

The Future of children·1994
Same author

Improving child protective services: how to expand and implement the consensus.

Children today·1992
Same author

Mandatory reporting of child abuse and research on the effects of prenatal drug exposure.

NIDA research monograph·1992
Same author

Rationing access to advanced medical techniques.

The Journal of legal medicine·1987
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Nutrition
  • Health Services Research
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is widely believed to be effective due to bipartisan support.
  • Existing research suggests some dietary and health improvements, but the most significant benefits are concentrated in the prenatal program.
  • Methodological weaknesses in current studies cast doubt on the overall effectiveness of WIC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the research supporting the effectiveness of the WIC program.
  • To identify key limitations in WIC research, including selection bias, simultaneity bias, and lack of generalizability.
  • To explore potential impacts of WIC on infant mortality, prematurity, birthweight, anemia, and nutrient intake.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing research studies on the WIC program.
  • Identification and critique of methodological weaknesses in the evaluated studies.
  • Assessment of the range of potential impacts based on current evidence.

Main Results:

  • Research findings on WIC's impact on infant mortality, prematurity, and birthweight are highly uncertain, ranging from zero to substantial.
  • The prenatal WIC program shows some benefits, but research limitations create uncertainty.
  • For infants, children, and postpartum/breastfeeding mothers, WIC appears to have only small to modest effects on anemia and nutrient intake.

Conclusions:

  • The evidence supporting the broad effectiveness of WIC is weaker than commonly believed due to significant research limitations.
  • There is a need for a policy debate on WIC's role and impacts, alongside increased flexibility for state and local agencies.
  • Program reforms and rigorous evaluation are essential to enhance WIC's positive impacts and ensure its effectiveness.