Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating variance components in natural populations using inferred relationships.

S C Thomas1, J M Pemberton, W G Hill

  • 1Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, U.K. sthomas@srv0.bio.ed.ac.uk

Heredity
|June 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Estimating heritability in natural populations is now possible without pedigree data using marker information. New methods offer trade-offs between bias and variance in heritability estimates.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Satellite-Derived NDVI Predicts Forage Availability in a Wild Ungulate System: Ground-Truthing Using Field-Collected Vegetation Biomass.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Using genomic prediction to detect microevolutionary change of a quantitative trait.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2022
Same author

Genetic architecture and lifetime dynamics of inbreeding depression in a wild mammal.

Nature communications·2021
Same author

Within-trio tests provide little support for post-copulatory selection on major histocompatibility complex haplotypes in a free-living population.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2021
Same author

Senescence in immunity against helminth parasites predicts adult mortality in a wild mammal.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2019
Same author

Between-population differences in the genetic and maternal components of body mass in roe deer.

BMC evolutionary biology·2018

Area of Science:

  • Quantitative genetics
  • Population genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Estimating heritability traditionally requires detailed pedigree information, which is often unavailable in natural populations.
  • Marker information offers a potential solution for heritability estimation without explicit relationship data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of two marker-based heritability estimation techniques: regression-based and likelihood-based.
  • To evaluate the impact of factors like marker information, heritability, relatedness, and sample size on estimation accuracy.
  • To introduce and assess a modified likelihood-based technique with fewer prior assumptions.

Main Methods:

  • Computer simulations were employed to compare regression-based and likelihood-based heritability estimators.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study analyzed the bias and variance of estimates under varying simulation parameters.
  • A modified likelihood-based method was developed and tested.

    • Main Results:

    • Heritability estimation bias decreased with increased marker data, decreased simulated heritability, increased relatedness, and larger sample sizes.
    • Both methods showed tolerance to missing genotypic data.
    • The regression-based method had lower average bias but higher variance, while likelihood-based methods had higher average bias but lower variance.
    • The modified likelihood technique demonstrated reduced bias compared to the original likelihood method.

    Conclusions:

    • Marker-based methods provide viable alternatives for estimating heritability in populations lacking pedigree data.
    • The choice between regression and likelihood methods involves a trade-off between bias and variance.
    • The modified likelihood approach offers an improved, less assumption-dependent tool for heritability estimation.