Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systematic review and meta-analysis in anatomic pathology.

M K Heatley1

  • 1Department of Pathology, The Royal Liverpool Hospital, UK.

Histopathology
|June 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses enhance traditional research by standardizing data retrieval and analysis. These methods are crucial for accumulating large case numbers and ensuring rigorous scientific evaluation in pathology and medicine.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An audit to establish the proportion of cervical punch biopsies that meet criteria for adequacy.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2010
Same author

Are levels in cervical specimens necessary?

Journal of clinical pathology·2009
Same author

Comparison of examination of the entire cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer: comment on a paper.

Journal of clinical pathology·2008
Same author

Immunohistochemical biomarkers of value in distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from gastric carcinoma: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis.

Histopathology·2007
Same author

Dissection and reporting of the organs of the female genital tract.

Journal of clinical pathology·2007
Same author

Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix-a systematic review of the literature.

Histopathology·2007

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Pathology data analysis

Background:

  • Traditional narrative reviews are complemented by systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • These advanced techniques are increasingly adopted in clinical medicine and anatomical pathology.
  • High-quality systematic reviews require substantial case accumulation from well-designed studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of standardized data presentation in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • To discuss emerging techniques for data aggregation from diverse patient studies.
  • To emphasize the evolving requirements for detailed results reporting in research papers.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic data retrieval and analysis techniques.
  • Accumulation of large case numbers from well-planned studies.
  • Standardization of data presentation for enhanced analysis.
  • Development of techniques for aggregating individual patient data across studies.
  • Utilizing the internet for posting anonymized patient data.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide a robust complement to narrative reviews.
  • Standardized data presentation facilitates high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • Emerging techniques enable the integration of data from individual patients across multiple studies.
  • Future research may necessitate more detailed reporting of results, potentially via online data sharing.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are dynamic, requiring continuous data contribution and analysis updates.
  • Careful evaluation of results from these methodologies is essential.
  • The role of expert reviewers is significantly expanded by these advanced research techniques.

Related Experiment Videos