Utility of hepatitis C virus serotypes in predicting response to treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Consensus...

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping has been shown to predict response to interferon, but is expensive. HCV serotyping is less expensive and simpler, and may be similarly useful. Using data from a large, randomized trial comparing consensus interferon (CIFN) and interferon alfa-2b (IFN alfa-2b) in patients with chronic HCV, we evaluated response rates based on HCV serotypes versus genotypes. Patients included in this analysis received subcutaneous injection of 9 microg CIFN (n = 232) or 3 MU IFN alfa-2b (n = 240) three times weekly for 24 weeks followed by 24 weeks of observation. Serum HCV RNA concentrations were measured regularly during treatment and at the end of both the treatment and post-treatment periods. Response to interferon was similar for HCV antibody types and their corresponding genotypes. The end-of-treatment HCV RNA rate of response (defined as undetectable serum on two consecutive assessments) was 29% for serotype 1 versus 24% for genotype 1 after CIFN; and 14% versus 15%, respectively, after IFN alfa-2b. Independently of treatment, patients infected with serotype or genotype 2 or 3 had a better therapeutic response than those infected with serotype or genotype 1. Similar results were obtained based on HCV antibody typing and genotyping, suggesting the potential of the former for predicting response to interferon.