Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calculating nucleic acid secondary structure.

M Zuker1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University, St Louis, 63110, USA. zuker@ibc.wustl.edu

Current Opinion in Structural Biology
|June 14, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The epidemiology and clinical features of Legionella pneumonia (LP) in patients older than 60 years old who were hospitalized with pneumonia in northern Israel].

Harefuah·2002
Same author

The hepatitis B virus pregenome: prediction of RNA structure and implications for the emergence of deletions.

Intervirology·2000
Same author

Metrics on RNA secondary structures.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2000
Same author

Mycobacterium fortuitum osteomyelitis of the cuboid after nail puncture wound.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal·2000
Same author

Fast evaluation of internal loops in RNA secondary structure prediction.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·1999
Same author

Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure.

Journal of molecular biology·1999
Same journal

Tomogram exploration through template matching and deep learning.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

A comparative review of cryo-electron ptychography: Biological applications and future perspectives.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Metabolic disruptions through a three-dimensional genomic lens.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Collective variable design for biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Polymer scaling in protein crowding: From dilute coils to semidilute meshes.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same journal

Tuning the physicochemical properties of rationally designed protein-based biomolecular condensates.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
See all related articles

New methods improve nucleic acid secondary structure calculations using DNA energy parameters and enhanced RNA parameters. Advanced algorithms now combine phylogenetic analysis with energy minimization for greater accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Calculating nucleic acid secondary structure is crucial for understanding gene function.
  • Existing methods for RNA secondary structure determination are often manual and time-consuming.
  • Accurate energy parameters are essential for computational structure prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To report new results in nucleic acid secondary structure calculation.
  • To highlight advancements in DNA and RNA energy parameters.
  • To introduce novel algorithms combining phylogenetic and energy-based approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing free energy minimization techniques.
  • Employing phylogenetic comparisons for structure validation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developing and applying new computer algorithms integrating covariation analysis with energy methods.

    • Main Results:

    • A complete set of DNA energy parameters is now available.
    • RNA energy parameters have been significantly improved.
    • New algorithms effectively combine covariation analysis with energy methods for structure prediction.

    Conclusions:

    • Recent advancements provide more accurate tools for nucleic acid secondary structure prediction.
    • Improved energy parameters and novel algorithms enhance computational approaches.
    • The integration of phylogenetic and energy-based methods represents a significant step forward in the field.