Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

07:25
A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy Before Radical Prostatectomy: Update on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Trials
1Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Summary
Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) improved pathologic results in localized prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. However, both Phase II and III trials found no significant difference in prostate-specific antigen relapse rates between NHT and control groups.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Radical prostatectomy is a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.
- Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) is sometimes used before surgery.
- The impact of NHT on pathologic outcomes and long-term survival remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) on pathologic results and relapse-free survival in patients with localized prostate cancer.
- To report follow-up data from Phase II and III clinical trials comparing radical prostatectomy with or without NHT.
Main Methods:
- Phase II trial: 141 patients received radical prostatectomy with or without NHT, comparing NHT group with concurrent controls.
- Phase III trial: 140 patients randomized to radical prostatectomy with or without NHT.
- Outcomes assessed included pathologic results (organ-confined disease, margin status) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival.
Main Results:
- Phase II: NHT significantly increased organ-confined margin-negative disease (70% vs. 49%, P=0.0057), but no difference in PSA relapse rates (P=0.92).
- Phase III: NHT showed a trend towards more organ-confined disease (70% vs. 59%, P=0.17) and significantly reduced positive margin rates (19% vs. 37%, P=0.023).
- Phase III: No significant difference in PSA relapse rates observed with NHT (P=0.73).
Conclusions:
- Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) improves pathologic outcomes, specifically reducing positive surgical margins in localized prostate cancer.
- Despite improved pathologic results, NHT did not significantly impact prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival in the reported follow-up periods.
- Further long-term follow-up is required to determine if the reduction in positive margins translates to improved disease-free survival.

