Related Experiment Videos
Pattern reversal visual evoked response in retinitis pigmentosa
F R Paranhos1, O Katsum, M Arai
1Shepens Eye Research Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, and Schepens Retina Associates, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. frlp@zaz.com.br
Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology
|June 16, 2000
Summary
Pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) objectively evaluates visual function in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients with preserved central vision. This method is useful when electroretinograms are subnormal or unrecordable.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Electrophysiology
Background:
- Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a group of inherited retinal diseases that cause progressive vision loss.
- Objective measures of visual function are crucial for monitoring disease progression and evaluating treatment efficacy in RP.
- Traditional electroretinograms (ERGs) may be unrecordable or subnormal in RP patients, necessitating alternative assessment methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER) can objectively assess visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP).
- To compare PVER results with visual acuity (VA) and visual field (VF) measurements in RP patients.
- To evaluate the utility of PVER as a diagnostic tool for RP when other electrophysiological tests are limited.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical records of 29 RP patients with VA better than 20/100.
- Recording of steady-state PVER using five different check sizes (160 to 10 min of arc).
- Measurement of best-corrected VA (ETDRS chart) and visual fields (Goldmann perimetry, isopter IV-2).
Main Results:
- All RP patients had recordable PVERs, while only 41% had recordable ERGs.
- PVER amplitudes showed a significant correlation with VA at intermediate check sizes (40 and 20 min of arc).
- RP patients exhibited a flattened PVER amplitude-check size function compared to normal subjects, indicating reduced visual function.
Conclusions:
- PVER is a valuable and objective method for evaluating visual function in RP patients with preserved central vision.
- PVER can provide useful information when ERGs are subnormal or unobtainable in RP.
- The findings support the use of PVER as a complementary tool in the clinical management of retinitis pigmentosa.